Passage Workspace

Job 5:17

A focused desk for reading, commentary, cross-references, original language notes, and your own observations.

Chapter Interlinear Verse Page

Job 5:17

17 Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty:

Chapter Context

Job 5 is a wisdom dialogue chapter in the Old Testament that explores themes of obedience, redemption, covenant. Written during the patriarchal period (literary composition later), this chapter should be understood within its historical context: Ancient wisdom traditions often wrestled with the problem of suffering and divine justice.

The chapter can be divided into several sections:

  1. Verses 1-5: Introduction and setting the context
  2. Verses 6-12: Development of key themes
  3. Verses 13-20: Central message and teachings
  4. Verses 21-27: Conclusion and application

This chapter is significant because it illustrates divine judgment and mercy in response to human actions. When studying this passage, it's important to consider both its immediate context within Job and its broader place in the scriptural canon.

Verse Study

Job 5:17

17 Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty:

Analysis

Eliphaz pronounces a beatitude: 'Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty.' The word ashre (אַשְׁרֵי, happy/blessed) opens many Psalms (1:1, 32:1), suggesting spiritual wellbeing. The term yakach (יָכַח, correcteth) means to reprove, rebuke, or discipline. Musar (מוּסָר, chastening) refers to instruction through discipline. Eliphaz's theology sees all suffering as corrective discipline, assuming Job has sinned and God is teaching him. While discipline is indeed a mark of God's love (Hebrews 12:5-11), not all suffering is disciplinary.

Historical Context

This verse is quoted in Hebrews 12:5 from Proverbs 3:11-12, showing its truth in appropriate contexts. Ancient wisdom emphasized that wise people accept correction. Eliphaz's error isn't in the principle but in the application—he assumes Job's suffering must be correction for sin rather than testing that will vindicate righteousness. The passage illustrates how true doctrine can be misapplied.

Reflection

  • How do we discern when suffering is divine discipline versus testing or spiritual warfare?
  • What does Eliphaz's misapplication of true doctrine teach about the importance of discernment in pastoral care?

Word Studies

  • God: אֱלֹהִים (Elohim) H433 - God (plural of majesty)

Cross-References

Original Language

הִנֵּ֤ה H2009 אַשְׁרֵ֣י H835 אֱ֭נוֹשׁ H582 יֽוֹכִחֶ֣נּוּ H3198 אֱל֑וֹהַּ H433 וּמוּסַ֥ר H4148 שַׁ֝דַּ֗י H7706 אַל H408 תִּמְאָֽס׃ H3988