Psalms 73:5

Authorized King James Version

They are not in trouble as other men; neither are they plagued like other men.

Word-by-Word Analysis

בַּעֲמַ֣ל

H5999

They are not in trouble

toil, i.e., wearing effort; hence, worry, whether of body or mind

אֱנ֣וֹשׁ

H582

as other men

properly, a mortal (and thus differing from the more dignified h0120); hence, a man in general (singly or collectively)

אֵינֵ֑מוֹ

H369

a nonentity; generally used as a negative particle

וְעִם

H5973

adverb or preposition, with (i.e., in conjunction with), in varied applications; specifically, equally with; often with prepositional prefix (and then

אָ֝דָ֗ם

H120

other men

ruddy i.e., a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.)

לֹ֣א

H3808

not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles

יְנֻגָּֽעוּ׃

H5060

neither are they plagued

properly, to touch, i.e., lay the hand upon (for any purpose; euphemistically, to lie with a woman); by implication, to reach (figuratively, to arrive

Analysis

The worship and praise theme here intersects with the broader canonical witness to God's character and purposes. Biblical theology recognizes this as part of progressive revelation that finds its culmination in Christ. The phrase emphasizing divine revelation contributes to our systematic understanding of Christian doctrine and connects to the broader scriptural witness about God's consistent character and purposes.

Historical Context

The literary and historical milieu of ancient Near Eastern poetry and hymnic literature for worship shapes this text's meaning. Israel's liturgical traditions developed through centuries of temple worship and personal devotion Understanding a worldview centered on covenant relationship between God and His people helps modern readers appreciate why the author emphasizes divine revelation in this particular way.

Questions for Reflection

How does this verse's literary context within Psalms chapter 73 illuminate its theological significance, and what does this teach us about biblical interpretation?
How might the original audience's understanding of divine revelation differ from modern interpretations, and what bridges can be built between ancient meaning and contemporary application?
In what ways does this verse's emphasis on divine revelation address questions about God's character and purposes in the modern world, and how should the church respond?