Numbers 27:4

Authorized King James Version

PDF

Why should the name of our father be done away from among his family, because he hath no son? Give unto us therefore a possession among the brethren of our father.

Original Language Analysis

לָ֣מָּה H4100
לָ֣מָּה
Strong's: H4100
Word #: 1 of 16
properly, interrogative what? (including how? why? when?); but also exclamation, what! (including how!), or indefinitely what (including whatever, and
יִגָּרַ֤ע be done away H1639
יִגָּרַ֤ע be done away
Strong's: H1639
Word #: 2 of 16
to scrape off; by implication, to shave, remove, lessen, withhold
שֵׁם Why should the name H8034
שֵׁם Why should the name
Strong's: H8034
Word #: 3 of 16
an appellation, as a mark or memorial of individuality; by implication honor, authority, character
אָבִֽינוּ׃ of our father H1
אָבִֽינוּ׃ of our father
Strong's: H1
Word #: 4 of 16
father, in a literal and immediate, or figurative and remote application
בְּת֖וֹךְ among H8432
בְּת֖וֹךְ among
Strong's: H8432
Word #: 5 of 16
a bisection, i.e., (by implication) the center
מִשְׁפַּחְתּ֔וֹ his family H4940
מִשְׁפַּחְתּ֔וֹ his family
Strong's: H4940
Word #: 6 of 16
a family, i.e., circle of relatives; figuratively, a class (of persons), a species (of animals) or sort (of things); by extension a tribe or people
כִּ֛י H3588
כִּ֛י
Strong's: H3588
Word #: 7 of 16
(by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below); often largely modified by other particles annexed
אֵ֥ין H369
אֵ֥ין
Strong's: H369
Word #: 8 of 16
a nonentity; generally used as a negative particle
ל֖וֹ H0
ל֖וֹ
Strong's: H0
Word #: 9 of 16
בֵּ֑ן because he hath no son H1121
בֵּ֑ן because he hath no son
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 10 of 16
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
תְּנָה Give H5414
תְּנָה Give
Strong's: H5414
Word #: 11 of 16
to give, used with greatest latitude of application (put, make, etc.)
לָּ֣נוּ H0
לָּ֣נוּ
Strong's: H0
Word #: 12 of 16
אֲחֻזָּ֔ה unto us therefore a possession H272
אֲחֻזָּ֔ה unto us therefore a possession
Strong's: H272
Word #: 13 of 16
something seized, i.e., a possession (especially of land)
בְּת֖וֹךְ among H8432
בְּת֖וֹךְ among
Strong's: H8432
Word #: 14 of 16
a bisection, i.e., (by implication) the center
אֲחֵ֥י the brethren H251
אֲחֵ֥י the brethren
Strong's: H251
Word #: 15 of 16
a brother (used in the widest sense of literal relationship and metaphorical affinity or resemblance [like h0001])
אָבִֽינוּ׃ of our father H1
אָבִֽינוּ׃ of our father
Strong's: H1
Word #: 16 of 16
father, in a literal and immediate, or figurative and remote application

Analysis & Commentary

Why should the name of our father be done away from among his family, because he hath no son? Give unto us therefore a possession among the brethren of our father.

The daughters of Zelophehad ask a revolutionary question that challenges patriarchal inheritance laws. Their concern about their father's name (shem) being "done away" reflects ancient Near Eastern values where a man's legacy depended on descendants inheriting his land. The rhetorical question "Why should...?" doesn't accept injustice as inevitable but appeals to reason and fairness.

Their request "Give unto us...a possession" (achuzzah, inherited property) demonstrates courage to advocate for justice within established systems. They don't reject the inheritance system but expand it to include daughters when no sons exist. The phrase "among the brethren of our father" shows they seek equality with male relatives, not privilege over them. This appeal leads to landmark legal reform (Numbers 27:7-11) where God himself validates their claim, establishing that justice sometimes requires updating human traditions to align with divine fairness. Women's voices, even in patriarchal contexts, can catalyze righteous change.

Historical Context

This event occurred during Israel's wilderness period (around 1406 BC) as they prepared to distribute Canaan's land. Ancient Near Eastern inheritance laws universally favored sons, with daughters typically receiving dowries at marriage but not land inheritance. Property passed through male lines to preserve tribal and family holdings. Zelophehad's daughters—Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah—belonged to Manasseh's tribe and faced real economic vulnerability without inheritance rights. Their bold approach to Moses at the tabernacle entrance (Numbers 27:2) showed remarkable courage in a male-dominated legal setting. God's response established precedent-setting law that protected women's economic security while maintaining tribal land distribution. This case appears twice more (Numbers 36, Joshua 17:3-6), demonstrating its importance. It previews the Bible's recurring theme that God's justice transcends cultural limitations.

Questions for Reflection

Related Resources

Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.

Study Resources