And they came near before Eleazar the priest, and before Joshua the son of Nun, and before the princes, saying, The LORD commanded Moses to give us an inheritance among our brethren. Therefore according to the commandment of the LORD he gave them an inheritance among the brethren of their father.
And they came near before Eleazar the priest, and before Joshua the son of Nun, and before the princes, saying, The LORD commanded Moses to give us an inheritance among our brethren—The daughters approach the highest authorities of Israel: the high priest (representing divine will through Urim and Thummim), the civil leader, and the tribal princes. Their petition is grounded not in emotional appeal but in explicit divine command. The phrase Yahweh tzivah et-Moshe (יְהוָה צִוָּה אֶת־מֹשֶׁה, "the LORD commanded Moses") appeals to established precedent and God's revealed will.
Therefore according to the commandment of the LORD he gave them an inheritance among the brethren of their father—Joshua's immediate compliance demonstrates fidelity to divine instruction over cultural convention. The phrase al-pi Yahweh (עַל־פִּי יְהוָה, "according to the mouth of the LORD") appears frequently in Joshua, emphasizing that land distribution was not arbitrary human decision but implementation of divine decree. Their inheritance was among the brethren of their father—they received equal standing with male heirs, a radical departure from surrounding cultures where women had minimal property rights.
Historical Context
Ancient Near Eastern law codes (Code of Hammurabi, Middle Assyrian Laws, Hittite Laws) generally excluded women from inheritance unless no male heirs existed, and even then, property often reverted to the husband's family. Israel's willingness to grant inheritance to daughters based on divine command demonstrated submission to revealed law over cultural tradition. The presence of Eleazar the high priest in this transaction (he succeeded Aaron and served alongside Joshua) indicates the theological significance—land allocation was a sacred act, not merely political. The location was likely Shiloh, where the tabernacle stood (18:1), making this a formal legal proceeding conducted in God's presence.
Questions for Reflection
How does the daughters' appeal to God's previous command (rather than their personal feelings or needs) model the proper basis for petitioning God?
What does Joshua's immediate obedience to God's established command teach about the importance of implementing biblical principles even when they challenge cultural norms?
In what areas of life might God be calling you to advocate for justice based on His revealed character and commands, even when it goes against traditional expectations?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
And they came near before Eleazar the priest, and before Joshua the son of Nun, and before the princes, saying, The LORD commanded Moses to give us an inheritance among our brethren—The daughters approach the highest authorities of Israel: the high priest (representing divine will through Urim and Thummim), the civil leader, and the tribal princes. Their petition is grounded not in emotional appeal but in explicit divine command. The phrase Yahweh tzivah et-Moshe (יְהוָה צִוָּה אֶת־מֹשֶׁה, "the LORD commanded Moses") appeals to established precedent and God's revealed will.
Therefore according to the commandment of the LORD he gave them an inheritance among the brethren of their father—Joshua's immediate compliance demonstrates fidelity to divine instruction over cultural convention. The phrase al-pi Yahweh (עַל־פִּי יְהוָה, "according to the mouth of the LORD") appears frequently in Joshua, emphasizing that land distribution was not arbitrary human decision but implementation of divine decree. Their inheritance was among the brethren of their father—they received equal standing with male heirs, a radical departure from surrounding cultures where women had minimal property rights.