Mark 14:59

Authorized King James Version

PDF

But neither so did their witness agree together.

Original Language Analysis

καὶ But G2532
καὶ But
Strong's: G2532
Word #: 1 of 8
and, also, even, so then, too, etc.; often used in connection (or composition) with other particles or small words
οὐδὲ neither G3761
οὐδὲ neither
Strong's: G3761
Word #: 2 of 8
not however, i.e., neither, nor, not even
οὕτως so G3779
οὕτως so
Strong's: G3779
Word #: 3 of 8
in this way (referring to what precedes or follows)
ἴση did G2470
ἴση did
Strong's: G2470
Word #: 4 of 8
similar (in amount and kind)
ἦν agree together G2258
ἦν agree together
Strong's: G2258
Word #: 5 of 8
i (thou, etc.) was (wast or were)
G3588
Strong's: G3588
Word #: 6 of 8
the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in english idiom)
μαρτυρία their witness G3141
μαρτυρία their witness
Strong's: G3141
Word #: 7 of 8
evidence given (judicially or genitive case)
αὐτῶν G846
αὐτῶν
Strong's: G846
Word #: 8 of 8
the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative g1438) of the third person, and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons

Analysis & Commentary

But neither so did their witness agree together (καὶ οὐδὲ οὕτως ἴση ἦν ἡ μαρτυρία αὐτῶν, kai oude houtōs isē ēn hē martyria autōn)—Even this more sophisticated false testimony failed the ἴση (isē, 'equal/consistent') standard. Matthew 26:60 specifies 'at the last came two,' suggesting these were the most promising witnesses, yet even they couldn't maintain consistent perjury. The emphatic οὐδὲ οὕτως (oude houtōs, 'not even thus') stresses that despite improvement, they still failed.

Mark's threefold emphasis on failed testimony (vv. 55, 56, 59) creates a dramatic crescendo of frustration for the Sanhedrin. God's Providence preserved His Son from illegal conviction even through the mouths of liars. Proverbs 19:5 promises 'a false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall not escape'—divine justice operates even when human courts fail.

Historical Context

The Mishnah (Sanhedrin 5:2) prescribed meticulous cross-examination of witnesses, asking about details of time, place, and circumstances. Even minor contradictions invalidated testimony. The judges were to compare testimonies for consistency (Hebrew: הזמה, hazmah). Mark's repeated emphasis suggests eyewitness knowledge of the trial's proceedings, possibly from Nicodemus or Joseph of Arimathea, both Sanhedrin members and secret disciples.

Questions for Reflection

Related Resources

Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.

Topics

People

Study Resources