False Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders—the Greek pseudochristoi (ψευδόχριστοι, 'false messiahs') and pseudoprophētai (ψευδοπροφῆται, 'false prophets') describe deceivers claiming divine authority. They will perform sēmeia kai terata (σημεῖα καὶ τέρατα, 'signs and wonders')—supernatural phenomena authenticating their claims. Satan empowers false signs (2 Thessalonians 2:9; Revelation 13:13-14).
To seduce, if it were possible, even the elect—the purpose is deception. The Greek pros to apoplanān (πρὸς τὸ ἀποπλανᾶν, 'toward the deceiving') indicates intentional seduction. If it were possible, even the elect (Greek ei dynaton kai tous eklektous, εἰ δυνατὸν καὶ τοὺς ἐκλεκτούς)—the counterfactual conditional implies impossibility. The elect cannot be ultimately deceived because God preserves them (John 10:28-29). Yet the attempt is so convincing that only divine preservation prevents success. This warns against trusting miraculous signs as authentication—truth rests on Scripture conformity, not supernatural phenomena.
Historical Context
Early church faced false teachers performing signs: Simon Magus (Acts 8:9-24) amazed people with sorcery; Bar-Jesus resisted Paul (Acts 13:6-12); sons of Sceva attempted exorcisms (Acts 19:13-16). Church history records ongoing deception: medieval wonder-workers, charismatic excess, modern faith healers, New Age channelers. Not all supernatural phenomena are divine—Satan counterfeits (Exodus 7:11, Egyptian magicians; Matthew 7:22-23, false workers of miracles). Discernment requires:
conformity to Scripture (Isaiah 8:20)
proper Christology (1 John 4:1-3)
godly fruit (Matthew 7:16)
Spirit's witness.
The doctrine of elect's perseverance assures believers: though deception is sophisticated, God preserves His own. False signs may deceive temporarily, but genuine faith endures.
Questions for Reflection
How can false teachers perform genuine supernatural signs—and why aren't miracles sufficient authentication of truth?
What does 'if it were possible, even the elect' teach about God's preservation of believers despite sophisticated deception?
How should Christians evaluate miraculous claims—what criteria distinguish divine signs from false wonders?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
False Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders—the Greek pseudochristoi (ψευδόχριστοι, 'false messiahs') and pseudoprophētai (ψευδοπροφῆται, 'false prophets') describe deceivers claiming divine authority. They will perform sēmeia kai terata (σημεῖα καὶ τέρατα, 'signs and wonders')—supernatural phenomena authenticating their claims. Satan empowers false signs (2 Thessalonians 2:9; Revelation 13:13-14).
To seduce, if it were possible, even the elect—the purpose is deception. The Greek pros to apoplanān (πρὸς τὸ ἀποπλανᾶν, 'toward the deceiving') indicates intentional seduction. If it were possible, even the elect (Greek ei dynaton kai tous eklektous, εἰ δυνατὸν καὶ τοὺς ἐκλεκτούς)—the counterfactual conditional implies impossibility. The elect cannot be ultimately deceived because God preserves them (John 10:28-29). Yet the attempt is so convincing that only divine preservation prevents success. This warns against trusting miraculous signs as authentication—truth rests on Scripture conformity, not supernatural phenomena.