the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative g1438) of the third person, and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons
Analysis & Commentary
They reasoned with themselves—Rather than seeking truth, they calculate consequences. The Greek verb indicates internal debate, weighing options. Their reasoning is pragmatic, not principled—they ask not What is true? but What answer benefits us politically? This exposes their hearts: they do not genuinely seek Jesus's authority's nature but seek to trap or discredit Him while protecting their status. If we shall say, From heaven; he will say, Why then did ye not believe him?—They recognize admitting John's divine commissioning would condemn them. If John was God's prophet, why did not they believe his message and repent? Why did not they accept his testimony about Jesus? Their dilemma reveals position incoherence—they knew John was genuinely prophetic but refused to believe because accepting John meant accepting Jesus, which threatened their power.
Historical Context
John's message of repentance condemned the religious establishment's hypocrisy. He called Pharisees and Sadducees a brood of vipers (Matthew 3:7) and warned that Abraham's descent did not guarantee salvation. This undermined their presumption and privilege. Many common people repented; most religious leaders did not. Their rejection of John paralleled their rejection of earlier prophets. Jesus later indicts them: You build tombs for the prophets, yet you are sons of those who murdered the prophets (Matthew 23:29-31).
Questions for Reflection
How does calculating What answer benefits me? rather than What is true? characterize modern evasion of Jesus's claims?
Why does suppressing known truth create intellectual incoherence in those rejecting God's revelation?
Where might you be reasoning pragmatically about theological questions rather than seeking truth regardless of cost?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
They reasoned with themselves—Rather than seeking truth, they calculate consequences. The Greek verb indicates internal debate, weighing options. Their reasoning is pragmatic, not principled—they ask not What is true? but What answer benefits us politically? This exposes their hearts: they do not genuinely seek Jesus's authority's nature but seek to trap or discredit Him while protecting their status. If we shall say, From heaven; he will say, Why then did ye not believe him?—They recognize admitting John's divine commissioning would condemn them. If John was God's prophet, why did not they believe his message and repent? Why did not they accept his testimony about Jesus? Their dilemma reveals position incoherence—they knew John was genuinely prophetic but refused to believe because accepting John meant accepting Jesus, which threatened their power.