And many lepers were in Israel in the time of Eliseus the prophet; and none of them was cleansed, saving Naaman the Syrian. Jesus cites a second example from Elisha's ministry (2 Kings 5). The emphatic oudeis autōn ekatharisthē, ei mē (οὐδεὶς αὐτῶν ἐκαθαρίσθη, εἰ μή, not one of them was cleansed, except) underscores God's sovereign choice. Many Israelite lepers remained unhealed while God cleansed Naaman, commander of the Syrian army—Israel's enemy.
Leprosy represented both physical disease and ceremonial uncleanness, often understood as divine judgment. The verb katharizō (καθαρίζω, to cleanse) carries both physical and ceremonial meaning—Naaman was healed and made ritually clean. That God chose to cleanse a Gentile military leader who didn't worship YHWH while Israelite lepers suffered demonstrated that God's grace isn't constrained by ethnicity, merit, or covenant status. This pointed directly to Jesus' mission to seek and save the lost, including Gentiles.
Historical Context
Elisha ministered in the Northern Kingdom during the 9th century BC, succeeding Elijah. Second Kings 5 records Naaman's healing—he was commander of Syria's (Aram's) army, which had defeated Israel in battle. Syria was Israel's bitter enemy. That God sent a captive Israelite girl to witness to Naaman, then cleansed him through the prophet's word, while Israelite lepers remained unhealed, was deeply offensive to Jewish pride. Naaman initially resisted Elisha's simple command to wash seven times in the Jordan, expecting elaborate ritual. His healing came through humble obedience, not merit.
Questions for Reflection
What does God's cleansing of Israel's enemy while Israelite lepers suffered reveal about grace transcending human categories?
How does Naaman's healing through simple obedience (despite initial resistance) illustrate salvation by faith, not works?
Why would Jesus' citation of God blessing Gentiles while bypassing Israel particularly enrage His Nazareth audience?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
And many lepers were in Israel in the time of Eliseus the prophet; and none of them was cleansed, saving Naaman the Syrian. Jesus cites a second example from Elisha's ministry (2 Kings 5). The emphatic oudeis autōn ekatharisthē, ei mē (οὐδεὶς αὐτῶν ἐκαθαρίσθη, εἰ μή, not one of them was cleansed, except) underscores God's sovereign choice. Many Israelite lepers remained unhealed while God cleansed Naaman, commander of the Syrian army—Israel's enemy.
Leprosy represented both physical disease and ceremonial uncleanness, often understood as divine judgment. The verb katharizō (καθαρίζω, to cleanse) carries both physical and ceremonial meaning—Naaman was healed and made ritually clean. That God chose to cleanse a Gentile military leader who didn't worship YHWH while Israelite lepers suffered demonstrated that God's grace isn't constrained by ethnicity, merit, or covenant status. This pointed directly to Jesus' mission to seek and save the lost, including Gentiles.