Job 34:8

Authorized King James Version

PDF

Which goeth in company with the workers of iniquity, and walketh with wicked men.

Original Language Analysis

וְאָרַ֣ח Which goeth H732
וְאָרַ֣ח Which goeth
Strong's: H732
Word #: 1 of 9
to travel
לְ֭חֶבְרָה in company H2274
לְ֭חֶבְרָה in company
Strong's: H2274
Word #: 2 of 9
association
עִם H5973
עִם
Strong's: H5973
Word #: 3 of 9
adverb or preposition, with (i.e., in conjunction with), in varied applications; specifically, equally with; often with prepositional prefix (and then
פֹּ֣עֲלֵי with the workers H6466
פֹּ֣עֲלֵי with the workers
Strong's: H6466
Word #: 4 of 9
to do or make (systematically and habitually), especially to practise
אָ֑וֶן of iniquity H205
אָ֑וֶן of iniquity
Strong's: H205
Word #: 5 of 9
strictly nothingness; also trouble, vanity, wickedness; specifically an idol
וְ֝לָלֶ֗כֶת H1980
וְ֝לָלֶ֗כֶת
Strong's: H1980
Word #: 6 of 9
to walk (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively)
עִם H5973
עִם
Strong's: H5973
Word #: 7 of 9
adverb or preposition, with (i.e., in conjunction with), in varied applications; specifically, equally with; often with prepositional prefix (and then
אַנְשֵׁי H376
אַנְשֵׁי
Strong's: H376
Word #: 8 of 9
a man as an individual or a male person; often used as an adjunct to a more definite term (and in such cases frequently not expressed in translation)
רֶֽשַׁע׃ with wicked H7562
רֶֽשַׁע׃ with wicked
Strong's: H7562
Word #: 9 of 9
a wrong (especially moral)

Analysis & Commentary

Which goeth in company with the workers of iniquity, and walketh with wicked men. Elihu escalates his accusations, claiming Job associates with evildoers. The Hebrew halak (הָלַךְ, "goeth/walketh") appears twice, emphasizing habitual conduct rather than isolated incidents. "Company" (chever, חֶבֶר) means fellowship, partnership, or alliance. Po'alei-aven (פֹּעֲלֵי אָוֶן, "workers of iniquity") describes those whose occupation is wickedness, while anshei-resha (אַנְשֵׁי־רֶשַׁע, "wicked men") denotes morally corrupt individuals.

This accusation directly contradicts Job's character established in 1:1 ("eschewed evil") and maintained throughout his suffering. Elihu commits the logical fallacy of guilt by association—because Job questions divine justice (as wicked people might), he must be aligned with the wicked. This reasoning parallels the friends' earlier errors: suffering proves sin, questioning proves wickedness. Yet the prologue reveals Job's suffering validates his righteousness, not his wickedness. Ironically, Job's "companions" throughout the book are his accusatory friends, whose theology proves false (42:7). The verse demonstrates how easily suffering saints can be slandered by those who misunderstand the purposes of affliction. It anticipates accusations against Christ, who was called "friend of publicans and sinners" (Luke 7:34) precisely because He came to save the lost.

Historical Context

Deuteronomy 13:6-8 commanded separation from those who enticed Israel to idolatry, making "walking with the wicked" a serious covenant violation. Psalm 1:1's beatitude blesses those who avoid the counsel, path, and seat of the wicked. Elihu invokes this theology but misapplies it—Job hasn't chosen wicked companions; he's suffering while maintaining righteousness. The accusation reflects how suffering can make the righteous vulnerable to false charges.

Questions for Reflection