Job 31:4

Doth not he see my ways, and count all my steps?

Word-by-Word Analysis

הֲלֹא

H3808

not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles

ה֭וּא

H1931

he (she or it); only expressed when emphatic or without a verb; also (intensively) self, or (especially with the article) the same; sometimes (as demo

יִרְאֶ֣ה

H7200

Doth not he see

to see, literally or figuratively (in numerous applications, direct and implied, transitive, intransitive and causative)

דְרָכָ֑י

H1870

my ways

a road (as trodden); figuratively, a course of life or mode of action, often adverb

וְֽכָל

H3605

properly, the whole; hence, all, any or every (in the singular only, but often in a plural sense)

צְעָדַ֥י

H6806

all my steps

a pace or regular step

יִסְפּֽוֹר׃

H5608

and count

properly, to score with a mark as a tally or record, i.e., (by implication) to inscribe, and also to enumerate; intensively, to recount, i.e., celebra

Analysis

The salvation theme here intersects with the metanarrative of redemption running from Genesis to Revelation. Biblical theology recognizes this as part of a unified storyline from the promise in Genesis 3:15 to its fulfillment in Christ. The phrase emphasizing divine revelation contributes to our systematic understanding of Christian doctrine and connects to the broader scriptural witness about God's saving work from the Exodus to the cross.

Historical Context

This passage must be understood within the political and social structures of the biblical period. The author writes to address believers seeking to understand God's will and purposes, making the emphasis on salvation particularly relevant. Historical documents from this period show cultural practices and social structures that would have been familiar to the original readers, illuminating the verse's original impact.

Questions for Reflection

In what ways does this verse's emphasis on divine revelation address religious pluralism and questions about the necessity of Christ, and how should the church respond?
In what ways does understanding divine revelation in its original context challenge or deepen contemporary Christian thinking about salvation?
How might the original audience's understanding of divine revelation differ from modern interpretations, and what bridges can be built between ancient meaning and contemporary application?