Job 22:15
Hast thou marked the old way which wicked men have trodden?
Original Language Analysis
הַאֹ֣רַח
way
H734
הַאֹ֣רַח
way
Strong's:
H734
Word #:
1 of 7
a well-trodden road (literally or figuratively); also a caravan
עוֹלָ֣ם
the old
H5769
עוֹלָ֣ם
the old
Strong's:
H5769
Word #:
2 of 7
properly, concealed, i.e., the vanishing point; generally, time out of mind (past or future), i.e., (practically) eternity; frequentatively, adverbial
תִּשְׁמ֑וֹר
Hast thou marked
H8104
תִּשְׁמ֑וֹר
Hast thou marked
Strong's:
H8104
Word #:
3 of 7
properly, to hedge about (as with thorns), i.e., guard; generally, to protect, attend to, etc
אֲשֶׁ֖ר
H834
אֲשֶׁ֖ר
Strong's:
H834
Word #:
4 of 7
who, which, what, that; also (as an adverb and a conjunction) when, where, how, because, in order that, etc
דָּרְכ֣וּ
have trodden
H1869
דָּרְכ֣וּ
have trodden
Strong's:
H1869
Word #:
5 of 7
to tread; by implication, to walk; also to string a bow (by treading on it in bending)
Historical Context
The 'old way' or 'ancient path' language appears in ancient Near Eastern wisdom as moral instruction. Eliphaz alludes to Genesis 6, where universal wickedness preceded the Flood. The rhetorical question expects the answer 'no,' but Eliphaz implies Job has indeed followed the wicked path.
Questions for Reflection
- How does Eliphaz's escalating rhetoric reveal the bankruptcy of strict retribution theology when confronted with innocent suffering?
- What ancient 'paths' of wickedness might modern believers be tempted to assume others are following based solely on their circumstances?
- How should we distinguish between genuine moral warning and false accusation driven by theological assumptions?
Analysis & Commentary
Hast thou marked the old way which wicked men have trodden? (הַאֹרַח עוֹלָם תִּשְׁמֹר אֲשֶׁר דָּרְכוּ מְתֵי־אָוֶן)—Orach olam (ancient path) typically refers to godly tradition (Jeremiah 6:16), but here Eliphaz uses it ironically for the metey-aven (men of iniquity). Shamar (to keep/guard/observe) asks if Job is following their example.
Eliphaz invokes the Flood generation as proof that wickedness brings swift judgment. The question implies Job has chosen the path of the pre-diluvian rebels. This represents the climax of Eliphaz's false accusation: not only has Job sinned, he's aligned with history's most notorious sinners. The rhetoric escalates because the retribution theology demands proportional wickedness to explain Job's suffering.