He made many to fall, yea, one fell upon another: and they said, Arise, and let us go again to our own people, and to the land of our nativity, from the oppressing sword.
He made many to fall, yea, one fell upon another—The Hebrew hirbah koshel (הִרְבָּה כּוֹשֵׁל, "made many to fall/stumble") and gam ish el re'ehu naphal (גַּם־אִישׁ אֶל־רֵעֵהוּ נָפָל, "one fell upon another") paint chaos—soldiers tripping over fallen comrades in panicked retreat, the antithesis of military order. The LORD (YHWH) is the active subject who causes this confusion, demonstrating that Egypt's defeat stems from divine action, not merely Babylonian superiority.
The mercenaries' cry reveals motive: Arise, and let us go again to our own people, and to the land of our nativity, from the oppressing sword. The verb shuv (שׁוּב, "go again/return") signals desertion. These hired soldiers abandon Egypt for their homelands, fleeing kherev ha-yonah (חֶרֶב הַיּוֹנָה, "the oppressing sword")—literally "the sword of the dove," possibly meaning "the cruel/violent sword" or referencing Babylon's fierce attack. This mass desertion fulfilled verse 9's ironic summons—the multinational coalition assembled for conquest instead scattered in terror. Egypt learned that mercenaries flee when wages cannot compensate for mortal danger.
Historical Context
Mercenary desertion was a known military problem in ancient warfare, but the scale here was catastrophic. When facing annihilation at Carchemish, Egypt's Ethiopian, Libyan, and Lydian auxiliaries abandoned the battle, leaving Egyptian forces to face Babylon alone. This pattern repeated in later conflicts—mercenaries served for profit, not loyalty. The theological lesson transcends military history: alliances built on self-interest rather than covenant faithfulness crumble under pressure. Israel's own attempts to rely on Egyptian aid (Isaiah 30-31) demonstrated this principle repeatedly.
Questions for Reflection
What does mercenary desertion teach about the unreliability of alliances based on self-interest rather than covenant commitment?
How does this passage illustrate the chaos that results when God actively opposes a nation or individual?
In what ways do we rely on 'mercenaries' (conditional relationships, hired loyalty) instead of the faithful God who never abandons His people?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
He made many to fall, yea, one fell upon another—The Hebrew hirbah koshel (הִרְבָּה כּוֹשֵׁל, "made many to fall/stumble") and gam ish el re'ehu naphal (גַּם־אִישׁ אֶל־רֵעֵהוּ נָפָל, "one fell upon another") paint chaos—soldiers tripping over fallen comrades in panicked retreat, the antithesis of military order. The LORD (YHWH) is the active subject who causes this confusion, demonstrating that Egypt's defeat stems from divine action, not merely Babylonian superiority.
The mercenaries' cry reveals motive: Arise, and let us go again to our own people, and to the land of our nativity, from the oppressing sword. The verb shuv (שׁוּב, "go again/return") signals desertion. These hired soldiers abandon Egypt for their homelands, fleeing kherev ha-yonah (חֶרֶב הַיּוֹנָה, "the oppressing sword")—literally "the sword of the dove," possibly meaning "the cruel/violent sword" or referencing Babylon's fierce attack. This mass desertion fulfilled verse 9's ironic summons—the multinational coalition assembled for conquest instead scattered in terror. Egypt learned that mercenaries flee when wages cannot compensate for mortal danger.