That they shall drive thee from men, and thy dwelling shall be with the beasts of the field, and they shall make thee to eat grass as oxen, and they shall wet thee with the dew of heaven, and seven times shall pass over thee, till thou know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.
Daniel details the judgment: expulsion from human society, dwelling with beasts, eating grass like oxen, wetness from heaven's dew, and passage of seven times—all 'till thou know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.' This final clause reveals judgment's purpose: not vindictive punishment but pedagogical discipline. God aims to teach Nebuchadnezzar theological truth: the Most High sovereignly governs human kingdoms, distributing authority according to His will, not human merit. The king must learn that his empire came through divine grant, not personal achievement. Reformed theology emphasizes God's absolute sovereignty over nations—He 'removeth kings, and setteth up kings' (Daniel 2:21). This judgment dismantles the king's illusion of autonomous power, forcing recognition of creaturelydependence. The phrase 'till thou know' indicates the judgment's conditional nature: once the lesson is learned, restoration follows.
Historical Context
Ancient Near Eastern royal ideology claimed kings ruled by divine mandate, but typically understood this as partnership—the god(s) chose the king, who then maintained divine favor through proper ritual, military success, and building projects. Nebuchadnezzar's inscriptions repeatedly claim Marduk selected him and enabled his victories. Daniel's interpretation radically reframes this: the Most High alone grants and removes authority; human contribution is negligible. This challenged not just Nebuchadnezzar but the entire ideological foundation of ancient imperialism. The historical pattern has repeated: every empire claiming autonomous greatness eventually learns (often through collapse) its dependence on factors beyond its control. God permits human pride to reach breaking points, then demonstrates sovereign control.
Questions for Reflection
What does the phrase 'till thou know' teach about discipline having educational rather than merely punitive purposes?
How does acknowledging God's sovereignty over nations challenge modern nationalism and political ideologies?
In what ways do we, like Nebuchadnezzar, need to 'learn' God's sovereignty through difficult experiences?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
Daniel details the judgment: expulsion from human society, dwelling with beasts, eating grass like oxen, wetness from heaven's dew, and passage of seven times—all 'till thou know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.' This final clause reveals judgment's purpose: not vindictive punishment but pedagogical discipline. God aims to teach Nebuchadnezzar theological truth: the Most High sovereignly governs human kingdoms, distributing authority according to His will, not human merit. The king must learn that his empire came through divine grant, not personal achievement. Reformed theology emphasizes God's absolute sovereignty over nations—He 'removeth kings, and setteth up kings' (Daniel 2:21). This judgment dismantles the king's illusion of autonomous power, forcing recognition of creaturelydependence. The phrase 'till thou know' indicates the judgment's conditional nature: once the lesson is learned, restoration follows.