Acts 7:39
To whom our fathers would not obey, but thrust him from them, and in their hearts turned back again into Egypt,
Original Language Analysis
Cross References
Historical Context
Israel's wilderness rebellions fill Exodus and Numbers—golden calf (Exodus 32), grumbling (Exodus 16), Korah's rebellion (Numbers 16), and longing for Egypt (Numbers 11:5). These incidents became paradigmatic examples of faithlessness in Jewish theology.
Stephen's audience would recognize these references immediately. His indictment is devastating: you're repeating your ancestors' pattern—rejecting God's messenger despite witnessing signs. First-century Jews took pride in not being like their rebellious ancestors, yet Stephen shows history repeating. The golden calf incident occurred merely weeks after Sinai—proximity to God's presence doesn't guarantee faithful obedience.
Questions for Reflection
- How does internal heart rebellion manifest in external religious rebellion?
- What 'Egypt' do Christians sometimes long for after experiencing spiritual deliverance?
- Why doesn't witnessing God's power automatically produce obedience?
- In what ways might we physically be in God's kingdom while our hearts remain elsewhere?
- How does this passage illuminate the necessity of regeneration—a supernatural heart change?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
To whom our fathers would not obey, but thrust him from them, and in their hearts turned back again into Egypt. Stephen exposes Israel's fundamental rebellion—outward physical deliverance accompanied by inward spiritual resistance.
The double refusal—would not obey and thrust him from them—shows both passive and active rejection. Disobedience begins internally (would not) and manifests externally (thrust him). This pattern reflects human depravity: even witnessing God's power doesn't guarantee submission to His authority.
The phrase in their hearts identifies the root problem. Reformed theology emphasizes the heart as the seat of affections and will. External compliance without heart transformation remains rebellion. Turned back again into Egypt reveals the tragic irony—physically freed from slavery, they remained mentally and spiritually enslaved.
Egypt represents the world system, sin's bondage, and fleshly comfort. Though God delivered them, they preferred slavery's predictability over faith's demands. This warns against merely external religious conversions that leave hearts unchanged. True deliverance requires heart transformation, not just changed circumstances.