Acts 5:27
A focused desk for reading, commentary, cross-references, original language notes, and your own observations.
Acts 5:27
27 And when they had brought them, they set them before the council: and the high priest asked them,
Chapter Context
Acts 5 is a historical narrative chapter in the New Testament that explores themes of truth, discipleship, creation. Written during the late first century CE (c. 80-85 CE), this chapter should be understood within its historical context: Chronicles Christianity's spread across the Roman Empire despite official and unofficial opposition.
The chapter can be divided into several sections:
- Verses 1-5: Introduction and setting the context
- Verses 6-12: Development of key themes
- Verses 13-20: Central message and teachings
- Verses 21-42: Conclusion and application
This chapter is significant because it reveals key aspects of God's character through divine actions and declarations. When studying this passage, it's important to consider both its immediate context within Acts and its broader place in the scriptural canon.
Verse Study
Acts 5:27
27 And when they had brought them, they set them before the council: and the high priest asked them,
Analysis
The accusation - 'Did not we straitly command you that ye should not teach in this name? and, behold, ye have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this man's blood upon us' - reveals multiple grievances. The phrase 'straitly command' (Greek intensive) emphasizes their authority. Their avoidance of Jesus' name ('this name,' 'this man') shows contempt or fear. 'Filled Jerusalem with your doctrine' admits gospel's saturation despite opposition. The blood-guilt accusation ('intend to bring this man's blood upon us') acknowledges their role in crucifixion they tried denying.
Historical Context
The council's previous prohibition (Acts 4:18) explicitly forbade Jesus-teaching. The phrase 'filled Jerusalem' (Greek 'peplērōkate') suggests pervasive influence. Their expressed fear of blood-guilt ironically recalls their earlier declaration 'His blood be on us' (Matthew 27:25), showing suppressed guilty conscience.
Reflection
- What does avoiding Jesus' name while acknowledging His movement's power reveal about suppressed conviction?
- How does the blood-guilt fear demonstrate that consciences testify to truth even when mouths deny it?
Cross-References
- Parallel theme: Matthew 5:22