The Prodigal Son

This masterpiece of storytelling, delivered in response to Pharisees' criticism that Christ received sinners and ate with them (Luke 15:2), vindicates divine grace toward repentant sinners while exposing self-righteous legalism. The parable contains two sons representing two opposite paths to lostness: the younger through profligacy, the elder through pride. Both need the father's grace; only one receives it.

The younger son's descent follows a tragic pattern: demanding his inheritance prematurely (implicitly wishing his father dead), journeying to a far country (geographic and spiritual distance), wasting his substance with riotous living (dissipation), experiencing famine, joining himself to a citizen of that country (attachment to the world), feeding swine (ultimate degradation for a Jew), desiring to fill his belly with swine's food (hitting bottom). His 'coming to himself' marks the turning point—recognition of his condition, remembrance of his father's house, repentance ('I have sinned against heaven, and before thee'), and resolution to return confessing unworthiness.The word 'prodigal' (from Latin prodigus) means wastefully extravagant. While applied to the son's squandering, it equally describes the father's lavish grace. The best robe signified honor, the ring authority, the shoes sonship (slaves went barefoot), the fatted calf celebration. Each gift proclaimed full restoration, not probationary servanthood. The father's running (undignified for an elderly Middle Eastern patriarch) expressed eager, unrestrained love.

The father's response transcends expectation: seeing him 'a great way off' (had been watching), filled with compassion, running, falling on his neck, kissing him repeatedly (Greek verb form indicates continuous action). The son's prepared speech was interrupted—the father called for the best robe, ring, shoes, and fatted calf before the confession concluded. Grace precedes and exceeds repentance.

The elder brother's reaction reveals the self-righteous heart: refusing to enter despite the father's plea, recounting his faithful service ('these many years do I serve thee'), complaining he'd never received recognition ('thou never gavest me a kid'), resenting grace shown to the undeserving ('this thy son... hath devoured thy living with harlots'). The father's gentle response—'Son, thou art ever with me, and all that I have is thine'—exposed the elder brother's error: he'd served as a slave seeking wages, not as a son enjoying inheritance. The parable ends without revealing whether the elder brother relented, leaving Pharisees to supply their own conclusion.