Psalms 118:9

Authorized King James Version

PDF

It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in princes.

Original Language Analysis

ט֗וֹב It is better H2896
ט֗וֹב It is better
Strong's: H2896
Word #: 1 of 5
good (as an adjective) in the widest sense; used likewise as a noun, both in the masculine and the feminine, the singular and the plural (good, a good
לַחֲס֥וֹת to trust H2620
לַחֲס֥וֹת to trust
Strong's: H2620
Word #: 2 of 5
to flee for protection; figuratively, to confide in
בַּיהוָ֑ה in the LORD H3068
בַּיהוָ֑ה in the LORD
Strong's: H3068
Word #: 3 of 5
(the) self-existent or eternal; jeho-vah, jewish national name of god
מִ֝בְּטֹ֗חַ than to put confidence H982
מִ֝בְּטֹ֗חַ than to put confidence
Strong's: H982
Word #: 4 of 5
properly, to hie for refuge (but not so precipitately as h2620); figuratively, to trust, be confident or sure
בִּנְדִיבִֽים׃ in princes H5081
בִּנְדִיבִֽים׃ in princes
Strong's: H5081
Word #: 5 of 5
properly, voluntary, i.e., generous; hence, magnanimous; as noun, a grandee (sometimes a tyrant)

Analysis & Commentary

It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in princes. This verse parallels verse 8 (better to trust God than man) but escalates from common people to political authorities. Tov lachasot b'YHWH mibtoach bin'divim (better to take refuge in the LORD than to trust in nobles/princes). N'divim (nobles/princes/rulers) represents the powerful, influential, politically connected—those who seem capable of providing security, resources, protection. Yet even princes are mortal, fallible, politically fickle. Psalm 146:3-4 warns: "Put not your trust in princes...his breath goeth forth, he returneth to his earth; in that very day his thoughts perish."

The contrast isn't between trusting God OR trusting humans but between ultimate versus penultimate trust. Believers may appropriately respect rulers (Romans 13:1-7), work with authorities, and benefit from just governance. But ultimate confidence, final security, foundational trust must rest in God alone. Princes die, policies shift, alliances crumble, political fortunes reverse. Only the LORD offers absolute reliability, unchanging faithfulness, eternal security. This challenges both naive cynicism (rejecting all human authority) and foolish idealism (expecting political solutions to spiritual problems).

Historical Context

Israel repeatedly learned this lesson painfully. When trusting God, they defeated overwhelming forces (Judges 7:1-25, 1 Samuel 14:1-23); when trusting princes and political alliances, they failed disastrously. Isaiah condemned trusting Egyptian military aid rather than the LORD (Isaiah 30:1-7, 31:1-3). Jeremiah opposed alliances with Egypt against Babylon (Jeremiah 37:5-10). King Asa foolishly allied with Syria instead of trusting God (2 Chronicles 16:1-9). King Ahaz rejected God's sign, seeking Assyrian help that became Israel's oppressor (2 Kings 16:7-9, Isaiah 7:1-17). Even godly kings like Hezekiah erred by showing Babylonian envoys his treasuries, seeking alliance (2 Kings 20:12-19). Political trust consistently disappointed; divine trust never failed those who genuinely relied on Him.

Questions for Reflection