the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative g1438) of the third person, and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons
Analysis & Commentary
Now there were with us seven brethren (ἦσαν δὲ παρ' ἡμῖν ἑπτὰ ἀδελφοί/ēsan de par' hēmin hepta adelphoi). The Sadducees begin their hypothetical scenario, likely fabricated rather than actual case. The number seven (ἑπτά/hepta) evokes completeness in Hebrew thought, suggesting exhaustive fulfillment of the levirate obligation. Having no issue (μὴ ἔχων σπέρμα/mē echōn sperma)—literally 'having no seed,' childless, the precise condition requiring levirate marriage. Left his wife unto his brother (ἀφῆκεν τὴν γυναῖκα αὐτοῦ/aphēken tēn gynaika autou)—legal obligation under Deuteronomy 25:5.
The scenario escalates an already rare situation (levirate marriage) into improbable extreme (seven sequential marriages). This rhetorical strategy—constructing absurd hypotheticals to discredit doctrine—appears throughout history. The Sadducees assume resurrection means merely resuscitating earthly existence, continuing marital relationships unchanged. This materialistic misunderstanding reduces eternal life to extended temporal life, missing the radical transformation resurrection entails.
Historical Context
Levirate marriage was practiced in ancient Israel but became increasingly rare by the Second Temple period. The book of Ruth provides a beautiful example where Boaz redeems Ruth, the Moabite widow, through levirate-type marriage, producing the lineage of David and ultimately Jesus (Ruth 4:1-17). However, not all brothers willingly fulfilled this duty (Deuteronomy 25:7-10 provides legal recourse for refusal). By Jesus's time, Jewish society had developed alternatives for widow care, making levirate marriage uncommon. The Sadducees' seven-brother scenario pushes the law to absurdity, assuming resurrection would create impossible marital tangles.
Questions for Reflection
How do skeptics create extreme hypothetical scenarios to make Christian doctrines seem illogical or impossible?
What does this verse reveal about the Sadducees' materialistic conception of afterlife, simply projecting earthly conditions into eternity?
How does the levirate law demonstrate that God's commands serve human flourishing within covenant community?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
Now there were with us seven brethren (ἦσαν δὲ παρ' ἡμῖν ἑπτὰ ἀδελφοί/ēsan de par' hēmin hepta adelphoi). The Sadducees begin their hypothetical scenario, likely fabricated rather than actual case. The number seven (ἑπτά/hepta) evokes completeness in Hebrew thought, suggesting exhaustive fulfillment of the levirate obligation. Having no issue (μὴ ἔχων σπέρμα/mē echōn sperma)—literally 'having no seed,' childless, the precise condition requiring levirate marriage. Left his wife unto his brother (ἀφῆκεν τὴν γυναῖκα αὐτοῦ/aphēken tēn gynaika autou)—legal obligation under Deuteronomy 25:5.
The scenario escalates an already rare situation (levirate marriage) into improbable extreme (seven sequential marriages). This rhetorical strategy—constructing absurd hypotheticals to discredit doctrine—appears throughout history. The Sadducees assume resurrection means merely resuscitating earthly existence, continuing marital relationships unchanged. This materialistic misunderstanding reduces eternal life to extended temporal life, missing the radical transformation resurrection entails.