And it came to pass, as they departed from him, Peter said unto Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here: and let us make three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias: not knowing what he said.
properly, to "lay" forth, i.e., (figuratively) relate (in words (usually of systematic or set discourse; whereas g2036 and g5346 generally refer to an
Analysis & Commentary
And it came to pass, as they departed from him, Peter said unto Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here: and let us make three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias: not knowing what he said. As Moses and Elijah were leaving (en tō diachōrizesthai autous, ἐν τῷ διαχωρίζεσθαι αὐτούς), Peter impulsively spoke. His address Epistata (Ἐπιστάτα, "Master") is Luke's preferred term—respectful but less than "Lord." Peter declares it is good for us to be here (kalon estin hēmas hōde einai, καλόν ἐστιν ἡμᾶς ὧδε εἶναι)—the mountaintop experience was glorious, and he wanted to preserve it.
His proposal to build skēnas (σκηνάς, "tabernacles" or "tents")—three shelters equalizing Jesus with Moses and Elijah—reveals theological confusion. The Feast of Tabernacles commemorated wilderness wandering and anticipated Messianic kingdom (Zechariah 14:16). Peter may have thought the kingdom was arriving and wanted to stay. Luke's parenthetical comment, not knowing what he said (mē eidōs ho legei, μὴ εἰδὼς ὃ λέγει), gently rebukes Peter's misunderstanding. Jesus cannot be equated with Moses and Elijah—He is their Lord and fulfillment.
Historical Context
The Feast of Tabernacles (Sukkot) was one of three major Jewish pilgrimage festivals, celebrating the harvest and commemorating Israel's wilderness dwelling in tents. During the feast, Jews built temporary shelters (sukkot) and lived in them for seven days. Rabbinic tradition associated the feast with the Messianic age—when Messiah comes, all nations would celebrate Tabernacles (Zechariah 14:16-19). Peter likely connected the glory, Moses, Elijah, and Messianic expectations with the feast. His desire to build booths was theologically confused but understandable—he recognized this as a Messianic moment but didn't yet grasp that Messiah must first suffer before reigning.
Questions for Reflection
Why was Peter's desire to build three tabernacles—equalizing Jesus with Moses and Elijah—theologically mistaken?
What spiritual danger exists in trying to prolong mountaintop experiences rather than descending to serve in the valley?
How does Peter's confusion about the kingdom's nature (glory now vs. suffering first) mirror contemporary misunderstandings of Christian life?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
And it came to pass, as they departed from him, Peter said unto Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here: and let us make three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias: not knowing what he said. As Moses and Elijah were leaving (en tō diachōrizesthai autous, ἐν τῷ διαχωρίζεσθαι αὐτούς), Peter impulsively spoke. His address Epistata (Ἐπιστάτα, "Master") is Luke's preferred term—respectful but less than "Lord." Peter declares it is good for us to be here (kalon estin hēmas hōde einai, καλόν ἐστιν ἡμᾶς ὧδε εἶναι)—the mountaintop experience was glorious, and he wanted to preserve it.
His proposal to build skēnas (σκηνάς, "tabernacles" or "tents")—three shelters equalizing Jesus with Moses and Elijah—reveals theological confusion. The Feast of Tabernacles commemorated wilderness wandering and anticipated Messianic kingdom (Zechariah 14:16). Peter may have thought the kingdom was arriving and wanted to stay. Luke's parenthetical comment, not knowing what he said (mē eidōs ho legei, μὴ εἰδὼς ὃ λέγει), gently rebukes Peter's misunderstanding. Jesus cannot be equated with Moses and Elijah—He is their Lord and fulfillment.