And he said unto him, We are passing from Beth-lehem-judah toward the side of mount Ephraim; from thence am I: and I went to Beth-lehem-judah, but I am now going to the house of the LORD; and there is no man that receiveth me to house.
And he said unto him, We are passing from Beth-lehem-judah toward the side of mount Ephraim; from thence am I: and I went to Beth-lehem-judah, but I am now going to the house of the LORD; and there is no man that receiveth me to house. The Levite's response provides crucial information. His journey from Bethlehem-Judah (Beit Lechem Yehudah, בֵּית לֶחֶם יְהוּדָה, "House of Bread") to Ephraim's hill country traces the same route Ruth would later travel in reverse (Ruth 1:1-2), connecting these narratives thematically. The Levite identifies himself as Ephraimite, establishing kinship with the old man.
Most significantly, he states "I am now going to the house of the LORD" (et-beit Yahweh ani holek, אֶת־בֵּית יְהוָה אֲנִי הֹלֵךְ). This phrase traditionally refers to the tabernacle, likely at Shiloh during this period (Joshua 18:1, Judges 18:31, 1 Samuel 1:3). That a Levite traveling to serve at Yahweh's house finds no hospitality in Israel indicts the nation's spiritual state. The irony is devastating: religious professionals travel to worship centers while covenant people fail basic moral obligations.
"There is no man that receiveth me to house" (ve'ein ish me'asef oti habbaitah, וְאֵין אִישׁ מְאַסֵּף אוֹתִי הַבָּיְתָה) uses the verb asaf (אָסַף, "gather in, receive"), suggesting the Levite had been waiting publicly, hoping for hospitality. The universal negative "no man" (ein ish, אֵין אִישׁ) emphasizes comprehensive failure. Reformed theology sees this as depicting total depravity—sin so pervasive that entire communities abandon basic righteousness. Christ later experienced similar rejection: "He came unto his own, and his own received him not" (John 1:11).
Historical Context
"The house of the LORD" during Judges refers to the tabernacle, most likely located at Shiloh in Ephraimite territory (about 20 miles north of Gibeah). Archaeological excavations at Shiloh (modern Khirbet Seilun) have revealed a major religious center from this period, destroyed around 1050 BCE (possibly by Philistines, referenced in Psalm 78:60, Jeremiah 7:12). Levites served in rotation at the tabernacle, explaining this journey. The Levite's secondary wife status (concubine) connects to Judges' theme of declining moral standards—even religious leaders compromised biblical marriage ideals. Bethlehem, meaning "house of bread," would later gain significance as David's birthplace and ultimately the Messiah's (Micah 5:2, Matthew 2:1).
Questions for Reflection
How does the Levite's journey to worship while Israel abandons covenant hospitality illustrate the disconnect between external religion and heart transformation?
What does the universal failure to receive the Levite teach about corporate sin and the danger of communal moral drift?
How does Christ's experience of rejection by His own people (John 1:11) provide hope for those rejected by religious communities despite genuine faith?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
And he said unto him, We are passing from Beth-lehem-judah toward the side of mount Ephraim; from thence am I: and I went to Beth-lehem-judah, but I am now going to the house of the LORD; and there is no man that receiveth me to house. The Levite's response provides crucial information. His journey from Bethlehem-Judah (Beit Lechem Yehudah, בֵּית לֶחֶם יְהוּדָה, "House of Bread") to Ephraim's hill country traces the same route Ruth would later travel in reverse (Ruth 1:1-2), connecting these narratives thematically. The Levite identifies himself as Ephraimite, establishing kinship with the old man.
Most significantly, he states "I am now going to the house of the LORD" (et-beit Yahweh ani holek, אֶת־בֵּית יְהוָה אֲנִי הֹלֵךְ). This phrase traditionally refers to the tabernacle, likely at Shiloh during this period (Joshua 18:1, Judges 18:31, 1 Samuel 1:3). That a Levite traveling to serve at Yahweh's house finds no hospitality in Israel indicts the nation's spiritual state. The irony is devastating: religious professionals travel to worship centers while covenant people fail basic moral obligations.
"There is no man that receiveth me to house" (ve'ein ish me'asef oti habbaitah, וְאֵין אִישׁ מְאַסֵּף אוֹתִי הַבָּיְתָה) uses the verb asaf (אָסַף, "gather in, receive"), suggesting the Levite had been waiting publicly, hoping for hospitality. The universal negative "no man" (ein ish, אֵין אִישׁ) emphasizes comprehensive failure. Reformed theology sees this as depicting total depravity—sin so pervasive that entire communities abandon basic righteousness. Christ later experienced similar rejection: "He came unto his own, and his own received him not" (John 1:11).