Joshua 6:3
And ye shall compass the city, all ye men of war, and go round about the city once. Thus shalt thou do six days.
Original Language Analysis
Cross References
Historical Context
Ancient Near Eastern siege warfare followed established patterns: building siege ramps to scale or breach walls, using battering rams against gates, digging tunnels under fortifications, or starving defenders through prolonged blockade. Egyptian, Assyrian, and Hittite military records detail these conventional tactics. God's command to merely march around Jericho inverted expectations—this was ceremonial procession, not military maneuver.
The seven-day pattern (six days of once-daily marching plus the seventh day's seven circuits) reflects biblical liturgical patterns. Creation took six days followed by Sabbath rest; Israel encamped six days then marched on the seventh; feast observances followed seven-day patterns. The liturgical structure emphasizes this is divine worship expressed through holy war, not mere military campaign. Israel's conquest was theologically conditioned—they executed divine judgment, not human aggression.
Jericho's defenders watching this strange ritual must have been bewildered. Conventional siege tactics they could understand and counter, but ritual marching defied explanation. This psychological warfare undermined morale. The marching testified to confidence in Yahweh's power—Israel needed no conventional tactics because their God would deliver victory. The fall of Jericho's walls would thus be unmistakably supernatural, leaving no room for human boasting (1 Corinthians 1:29-31).
Questions for Reflection
- What 'Jericho strategies' is God calling you to employ that seem foolish by worldly wisdom but demonstrate faith in His power?
- How do you respond when God's instructions don't produce immediate results—do you persevere in obedience or revert to conventional methods?
- What role does patient, persistent obedience play in seeing God's promises fulfilled in your life?
- How does this passage challenge pragmatism that evaluates methods by apparent effectiveness rather than faithfulness to God's commands?
- In what ways does Jericho's conquest illustrate that 'the foolishness of God is wiser than men' (1 Corinthians 1:25)?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
And ye shall compass the city, all ye men of war, and go round about the city once. Thus shalt thou do six days.
God's battle strategy defies military logic. The command to "compass the city" (vesabbotum et-ha'ir, וְסַבֹּתֶם אֶת־הָעִיר) means to circle or march around Jericho's perimeter. The phrase "all ye men of war" (kol-anshei hamilchamah, כָּל־אַנְשֵׁי הַמִּלְחָמָה) indicates full military mobilization—not for attacking but for marching in procession. This contradicts conventional siege tactics, which involved assault, starvation, or negotiation—never ritual circumambulation.
The instructions specify precise repetition: "once" daily "six days." This seemingly pointless repetition tests obedience and faith. From a military perspective, marching around a fortified city accomplishes nothing—it exposes troops to defensive fire while demonstrating tactical impotence. Yet God's strategy often appears foolish to worldly wisdom (1 Corinthians 1:25-27). Faith means obeying unconventional commands, trusting divine wisdom over human strategy.
Theologically, this illustrates that spiritual victory comes through obedience, not through human strength or clever tactics. The repeated marching builds suspense, tests patience, and demonstrates that God's ways transcend human understanding. The six days of marching without result require perseverance—continuing to obey when results aren't immediately visible. This prefigures New Testament teaching about faith as "the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen" (Hebrews 11:1). From a Reformed perspective, this demonstrates that faith involves radical trust in God's revealed will, even when His methods seem absurd by worldly standards.