Joshua 21:10

Authorized King James Version

PDF

Which the children of Aaron, being of the families of the Kohathites, who were of the children of Levi, had: for their's was the first lot.

Original Language Analysis

וַֽיְהִי֙ H1961
וַֽיְהִי֙
Strong's: H1961
Word #: 1 of 12
to exist, i.e., be or become, come to pass (always emphatic, and not a mere copula or auxiliary)
מִבְּנֵ֣י Which the children H1121
מִבְּנֵ֣י Which the children
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 2 of 12
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
אַֽהֲרֹ֔ן of Aaron H175
אַֽהֲרֹ֔ן of Aaron
Strong's: H175
Word #: 3 of 12
aharon, the brother of moses
מִמִּשְׁפְּח֥וֹת being of the families H4940
מִמִּשְׁפְּח֥וֹת being of the families
Strong's: H4940
Word #: 4 of 12
a family, i.e., circle of relatives; figuratively, a class (of persons), a species (of animals) or sort (of things); by extension a tribe or people
הַקְּהָתִ֖י of the Kohathites H6956
הַקְּהָתִ֖י of the Kohathites
Strong's: H6956
Word #: 5 of 12
a kohathite (collectively) or descendants of kehath
מִבְּנֵ֣י Which the children H1121
מִבְּנֵ֣י Which the children
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 6 of 12
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
לֵוִ֑י of Levi H3878
לֵוִ֑י of Levi
Strong's: H3878
Word #: 7 of 12
levi, a son of jacob
כִּ֥י H3588
כִּ֥י
Strong's: H3588
Word #: 8 of 12
(by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below); often largely modified by other particles annexed
לָהֶ֛ם H1992
לָהֶ֛ם
Strong's: H1992
Word #: 9 of 12
they (only used when emphatic)
הָיָ֥ה H1961
הָיָ֥ה
Strong's: H1961
Word #: 10 of 12
to exist, i.e., be or become, come to pass (always emphatic, and not a mere copula or auxiliary)
הַגּוֹרָ֖ל lot H1486
הַגּוֹרָ֖ל lot
Strong's: H1486
Word #: 11 of 12
properly, a pebble, i.e., a lot (small stones being used for that purpose); figuratively, a portion or destiny (as if determined by lot)
רִֽאישֹׁנָֽה׃ had for theirs was the first H7223
רִֽאישֹׁנָֽה׃ had for theirs was the first
Strong's: H7223
Word #: 12 of 12
first, in place, time or rank (as adjective or noun)

Analysis & Commentary

Which the children of Aaron, being of the families of the Kohathites, who were of the children of Levi, had: for their's was the first lot.

This verse emphasizes the Aaronic priesthood's priority: "their's was the first lot" (ki lahem hayah hagoral rishonah, כִּי לָהֶם הָיָה הַגּוֹרָל רִאשׁוֹנָה). Though lot-casting involves apparent chance, God sovereignly ordered outcomes so Aaron's descendants received first allocation. The term rishonah (רִאשׁוֹנָה, "first") signals honor and priority—those serving directly at God's altar received precedence in city distribution.

The phrase "children of Aaron, being of the families of the Kohathites, who were of the children of Levi" provides genealogical precision: Levi → Kohath → Aaron. This three-generation descent established priestly legitimacy. Only those tracing lineage through Aaron could serve as priests (Exodus 28:1, Numbers 3:10). Genealogical precision mattered profoundly in Israel—after the exile, priests unable to prove Aaronic descent were excluded from ministry (Ezra 2:61-63).

The "first lot" principle demonstrates that God honors those serving in positions requiring greater holiness and responsibility. Aaron's descendants bore unique burdens—entering the Holy of Holies, offering sacrifices, teaching Torah with authority. Greater responsibility warranted first consideration in material provision. This models the New Testament principle: elders who rule well deserve double honor, especially those laboring in preaching and teaching (1 Timothy 5:17).

Historical Context

The Aaronic priesthood's first-lot priority ensured they received cities nearest the worship center (Tabernacle at Shiloh, later Temple at Jerusalem). This proximity facilitated priestly rotation—priests served in courses/divisions (1 Chronicles 24:1-19), requiring regular travel to the worship site. Cities like Hebron, Libnah, and Anathoth (verse 18) clustered around Jerusalem, making priestly service logistically feasible. After 70 AD when Rome destroyed the Temple, the Aaronic priesthood ceased functioning—but Christ's eternal priesthood continues, and He forever intercedes for believers (Hebrews 7:23-25).

Questions for Reflection

Related Resources

Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.

Study Resources