Joshua 10:3

Authorized King James Version

PDF

Wherefore Adoni-zedek king of Jerusalem sent unto Hoham king of Hebron, and unto Piram king of Jarmuth, and unto Japhia king of Lachish, and unto Debir king of Eglon, saying,

Original Language Analysis

וַיִּשְׁלַ֨ח sent H7971
וַיִּשְׁלַ֨ח sent
Strong's: H7971
Word #: 1 of 22
to send away, for, or out (in a great variety of applications)
אֲדֹֽנִי H0
אֲדֹֽנִי
Strong's: H0
Word #: 2 of 22
צֶ֜דֶק Wherefore Adonizedek H139
צֶ֜דֶק Wherefore Adonizedek
Strong's: H139
Word #: 3 of 22
adoni-tsedek, a canaanitish king
מֶֽלֶךְ king H4428
מֶֽלֶךְ king
Strong's: H4428
Word #: 4 of 22
a king
יְרֽוּשָׁלִַ֗ם of Jerusalem H3389
יְרֽוּשָׁלִַ֗ם of Jerusalem
Strong's: H3389
Word #: 5 of 22
jerushalaim or jerushalem, the capital city of palestine
אֶל H413
אֶל
Strong's: H413
Word #: 6 of 22
near, with or among; often in general, to
הוֹהָ֣ם unto Hoham H1944
הוֹהָ֣ם unto Hoham
Strong's: H1944
Word #: 7 of 22
hoham, a canaanitish king
מֶֽלֶךְ king H4428
מֶֽלֶךְ king
Strong's: H4428
Word #: 8 of 22
a king
חֶ֠בְרוֹן of Hebron H2275
חֶ֠בְרוֹן of Hebron
Strong's: H2275
Word #: 9 of 22
chebron, the name of two israelites
וְאֶל H413
וְאֶל
Strong's: H413
Word #: 10 of 22
near, with or among; often in general, to
פִּרְאָ֨ם and unto Piram H6502
פִּרְאָ֨ם and unto Piram
Strong's: H6502
Word #: 11 of 22
piram, a canaanite
מֶֽלֶךְ king H4428
מֶֽלֶךְ king
Strong's: H4428
Word #: 12 of 22
a king
יַרְמ֜וּת of Jarmuth H3412
יַרְמ֜וּת of Jarmuth
Strong's: H3412
Word #: 13 of 22
jarmuth, the name of two places in palestine
וְאֶל H413
וְאֶל
Strong's: H413
Word #: 14 of 22
near, with or among; often in general, to
יָפִ֧יעַ and unto Japhia H3309
יָפִ֧יעַ and unto Japhia
Strong's: H3309
Word #: 15 of 22
japhia, the name of a canaanite, an israelite, and a place in palestine
מֶֽלֶךְ king H4428
מֶֽלֶךְ king
Strong's: H4428
Word #: 16 of 22
a king
לָכִ֛ישׁ of Lachish H3923
לָכִ֛ישׁ of Lachish
Strong's: H3923
Word #: 17 of 22
lakish, a place in palestine
וְאֶל H413
וְאֶל
Strong's: H413
Word #: 18 of 22
near, with or among; often in general, to
דְּבִ֥יר and unto Debir H1688
דְּבִ֥יר and unto Debir
Strong's: H1688
Word #: 19 of 22
debir, the name of an amoritish king and of two places in palestine
מֶֽלֶךְ king H4428
מֶֽלֶךְ king
Strong's: H4428
Word #: 20 of 22
a king
עֶגְל֖וֹן of Eglon H5700
עֶגְל֖וֹן of Eglon
Strong's: H5700
Word #: 21 of 22
eglon, the name of a place in palestine and of a moabitish king
לֵאמֹֽר׃ saying H559
לֵאמֹֽר׃ saying
Strong's: H559
Word #: 22 of 22
to say (used with great latitude)

Analysis & Commentary

Adoni-zedek assembles a coalition: sending to four other kings (Hebron, Jarmuth, Lachish, Eglon) with the message 'Come up unto me, and help me, that we may smite Gibeon: for it hath made peace with Joshua and with the children of Israel.' The number five (Jerusalem plus four allies) creates a significant alliance. The invitation 'come up unto me' suggests Jerusalem's primacy or elevation (geographically and politically). The verb 'help' (עָזַר, azar) requests military assistance, forming coalition warfare. The stated target—Gibeon—reveals the strategy: punish the defector to deter others. The phrase 'it hath made peace' uses the verb שָׁלוֹם (shalom—peace), the same root as the desired outcome (peace), now treated as treachery. Perspective matters: what Gibeon saw as survival, Canaanites saw as betrayal. The dual identification 'Joshua and the children of Israel' recognizes both leadership and nation as covenant partners with Gibeon.

Historical Context

The five-city coalition formed the core of southern Canaan's resistance. Jerusalem's central location and strength made Adoni-zedek natural leader. Hebron (twenty miles south), Jarmuth (sixteen miles southwest), Lachish (thirty miles southwest), and Eglon (location debated, likely nearby) created a geographic bloc in the southern highlands and Shephelah (foothills). These cities represented significant military power—Lachish especially was a major fortified city (archaeological excavations reveal massive walls and gates). The coalition's formation shows sophisticated political coordination among normally independent city-states. Ancient Near Eastern alliances typically involved mutual defense pacts with lead cities calling on allies during crisis. The decision to attack Gibeon rather than Israel directly reveals strategic thinking: directly attacking Israel had failed (Jericho, Ai); punishing Gibeon might restore Canaanite unity and deter further defections. The strategy almost worked—except it triggered Israel's treaty obligation to defend Gibeon, bringing the decisive confrontation Canaanites hoped to avoid.

Questions for Reflection

Related Resources

Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.

Study Resources

Bible Stories