Job 5:6

Although affliction cometh not forth of the dust, neither doth trouble spring out of the ground;

Word-by-Word Analysis

כִּ֤י׀

H3588

(by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below); often largely modified by other particles annexed

לֹֽא

H3808

not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles

יֵצֵ֣א

H3318

cometh not forth

to go (causatively, bring) out, in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively, direct and proxim

מֵֽעָפָ֣ר

H6083

of the dust

dust (as powdered or gray); hence, clay, earth, mud

אָ֑וֶן

H205

Although affliction

strictly nothingness; also trouble, vanity, wickedness; specifically an idol

וּ֝מֵֽאֲדָמָ֗ה

H127

of the ground

soil (from its general redness)

לֹֽא

H3808

not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles

יִצְמַ֥ח

H6779

spring out

to sprout (transitive or intransitive, literal or figurative)

עָמָֽל׃

H5999

neither doth trouble

toil, i.e., wearing effort; hence, worry, whether of body or mind

Analysis

The salvation theme here intersects with the metanarrative of redemption running from Genesis to Revelation. Biblical theology recognizes this as part of a unified storyline from the promise in Genesis 3:15 to its fulfillment in Christ. The phrase emphasizing divine revelation contributes to our systematic understanding of Christian doctrine and connects to the broader scriptural witness about God's saving work from the Exodus to the cross.

Historical Context

The historical context of the biblical period relevant to this book's composition provides crucial background for understanding this verse. The historical and cultural milieu of the biblical world informed the author's theological expression and the audience's understanding. The the cultural context of the biblical world would have shaped how the original audience understood divine revelation. Archaeological and historical evidence reveals Archaeological discoveries continue to illuminate the historical context of biblical texts.

Questions for Reflection

What practical applications emerge from understanding salvation as presented in this verse, particularly in light of addressing questions of religious pluralism and the exclusivity of Christ?
What systematic theological implications arise from this verse's treatment of salvation, and how does it contribute to a biblical theology of soteriology and the doctrine of salvation?
In what ways does this verse's emphasis on divine revelation address religious pluralism and questions about the necessity of Christ, and how should the church respond?