Job 13:22

Authorized King James Version

Then call thou, and I will answer: or let me speak, and answer thou me.

Word-by-Word Analysis

וּ֭קְרָא

H7121

Then call

to call out to (i.e., properly, address by name, but used in a wide variety of applications)

וְאָנֹכִ֣י

H595

אֶֽעֱנֶ֑ה

H6030

thou and I will answer

properly, to eye or (generally) to heed, i.e., pay attention; by implication, to respond; by extension to begin to speak; specifically to sing, shout,

אֽוֹ

H176

desire (and so probably in proverbs 31:4); hence (by way of alternative) or, also if

אֲ֝דַבֵּ֗ר

H1696

or let me speak

perhaps properly, to arrange; but used figuratively (of words), to speak; rarely (in a destructive sense) to subdue

וַהֲשִׁיבֵֽנִי׃

H7725

and answer

to turn back (hence, away) transitively or intransitively, literally or figuratively (not necessarily with the idea of return to the starting point);

Analysis

Within the broader context of Job, this passage highlights salvation through universal language and absolute statements. The theological weight of divine revelation connects to fundamental Christian doctrine about divine revelation, contributing to our understanding of God's nature and relationship with humanity. This verse contributes to the book's overall argument by building upon previous themes while advancing the overall message of Job.

Historical Context

The literary and historical milieu of the literary conventions and historical circumstances of biblical literature shapes this text's meaning. The historical development of salvation within the theological tradition of Job Understanding the ancient worldview that shaped the author's theological expression helps modern readers appreciate why the author emphasizes divine revelation in this particular way.

Questions for Reflection

In what ways does understanding divine revelation in its original context challenge or deepen contemporary Christian thinking about salvation?
What practical applications emerge from understanding salvation as presented in this verse, particularly in light of addressing questions of religious pluralism and the exclusivity of Christ?
In what ways does this verse's emphasis on divine revelation address religious pluralism and questions about the necessity of Christ, and how should the church respond?