Job & Suffering

Job Cries Out and His Friends Accuse

Job breaks his silence with a lament, wishing he had never been born. His three friends, believing suffering always comes from sin, accuse Job of hidden wrongdoing.


After seven days of silence, Job opened his mouth and cursed the day of his birth. 'May the day of my birth perish, and the night that said, "A boy is conceived!" Why did I not perish at birth, and die as I came from the womb?' His lament is raw, unfiltered anguish. He did not curse God, but he cursed his existence. He longed for death as a release from suffering.

'Why is light given to those in misery, and life to the bitter of soul, to those who long for death that does not come? I have no peace, no quietness; I have no rest, but only turmoil.'

Then Eliphaz responded. His words began gently but carried a devastating implication. 'Should not your piety be your confidence and your blameless ways your hope? Consider now: Who, being innocent, has ever perished? Where were the upright ever destroyed? I have observed that those who plow evil and those who sow trouble reap it.'

The theology was clear: suffering is always punishment for sin. Therefore, Job must have sinned. The logic seemed airtight to Eliphaz, confirmed by his own experience and even by a mystical vision he claimed to have received. But the logic was wrong. Job's friends operated on a formula—a mechanical understanding of divine justice that left no room for mystery, testing, or purposes beyond human comprehension.

Bildad picked up the theme. 'Does God pervert justice? Does the Almighty pervert what is right? When your children sinned against him, he gave them over to the penalty of their sin.' This was cruel. Job's children were dead, and Bildad suggested they got what they deserved. 'But if you will seek God earnestly and plead with the Almighty, if you are pure and upright, even now he will rouse himself on your behalf.'

The implication: Job was neither pure nor upright, and that's why God was not rousing Himself on Job's behalf.

Zophar was even more blunt. 'Oh, how I wish that God would speak, that he would open his lips against you and disclose to you the secrets of wisdom, for true wisdom has two sides. Know this: God has even forgotten some of your sin.'

According to Zophar, Job was getting less punishment than he deserved! His suffering was actually God's mercy, because Job's sin was so great that full justice would have been worse.

Through three rounds of speeches, this pattern repeated. Job's friends were certain: suffering equals sin, prosperity equals righteousness. Since Job was suffering catastrophically, he must have sinned catastrophically. Their counsel was to confess his sin, repent, and be restored.

But Job knew something they didn't. He knew he was innocent of the charges they imagined. 'I will defend my ways to his face. Though he slay me, yet will I hope in him; I will surely defend my ways to his face.' Job was caught in an impossible position. He knew he hadn't committed sins worthy of such suffering. Yet he also knew God was sovereign. How could both be true?

'My intercessor is my friend as my eyes pour out tears to God; on behalf of a man he pleads with God as one pleads for a friend.' Even in his protests, Job appealed to God against God. He longed for a mediator, someone to stand between him and the Almighty.

The friends' greatest failure was not their faulty theology but their lack of compassion. They came to comfort but became prosecutors. They turned Job's suffering into a courtroom, demanding confession when presence and silence would have been true comfort. They could not tolerate the mystery of undeserved suffering, so they created explanations that blamed the victim.

Job's isolation was now complete—abandoned by God (as it seemed), misunderstood by his friends, reduced to a living example of everything people feared most.

Download PDF