Ezra 2:14

Authorized King James Version

PDF

The children of Bigvai, two thousand fifty and six.

Original Language Analysis

בְּנֵ֣י The children H1121
בְּנֵ֣י The children
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 1 of 5
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
בִגְוָ֔י of Bigvai H902
בִגְוָ֔י of Bigvai
Strong's: H902
Word #: 2 of 5
bigvai, an israelite
אַלְפַּ֖יִם two thousand H505
אַלְפַּ֖יִם two thousand
Strong's: H505
Word #: 3 of 5
hence (the ox's head being the first letter of the alphabet, and this eventually used as a numeral) a thousand
חֲמִשִּׁ֥ים fifty H2572
חֲמִשִּׁ֥ים fifty
Strong's: H2572
Word #: 4 of 5
fifty
וְשִׁשָּֽׁה׃ and six H8337
וְשִׁשָּֽׁה׃ and six
Strong's: H8337
Word #: 5 of 5
six (as an overplus beyond five or the fingers of the hand); as ordinal, sixth

Analysis & Commentary

The children of Bigvai, two thousand fifty and six. Bigvai (בִּגְוַי, Bigvai, possibly 'in my body' or from Persian 'fortunate') led one of the largest returning families—2,056 people. This substantial number indicates a prominent clan that maintained cohesion through exile. Size didn't guarantee spiritual vitality (many large families remained in Babylon), but it did provide organizational strength for rebuilding.

The name's possible Persian origin suggests some families adopted aspects of Babylonian culture while maintaining Jewish identity. This wasn't necessarily syncretism but cultural adaptation—a pattern continued in the diaspora. Daniel, Ezra, and Nehemiah all bore pagan names while remaining faithful to Yahweh. The tension between cultural engagement and spiritual compromise required constant vigilance.

Bigvai also appears in Ezra 8:14 and Nehemiah 10:16, showing multigenerational participation in restoration. The family's continued prominence through successive returns and covenant renewals demonstrates sustained commitment beyond initial enthusiasm.

Historical Context

The size of Bigvai's clan (over 2,000) made it the second-largest family group in the return census. Such numbers required considerable organization for the 900-mile journey from Babylon. Travel occurred in family units under ancestral leadership, preserving social structure that would facilitate resettlement.

Large families provided economic advantage in rebuilding. Agricultural work, construction, and defense all benefited from numerous hands. The census numbers weren't merely statistical—they represented labor force, military strength, and reproductive capacity essential for national restoration after demographic catastrophe.

Questions for Reflection