Ezra 2:13

Authorized King James Version

PDF

The children of Adonikam, six hundred sixty and six.

Original Language Analysis

בְּנֵי֙ The children H1121
בְּנֵי֙ The children
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 1 of 6
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
אֲדֹ֣נִיקָ֔ם of Adonikam H140
אֲדֹ֣נִיקָ֔ם of Adonikam
Strong's: H140
Word #: 2 of 6
adonikam, the name of one or two israelites
וְשִׁשָּֽׁה׃ and six H8337
וְשִׁשָּֽׁה׃ and six
Strong's: H8337
Word #: 3 of 6
six (as an overplus beyond five or the fingers of the hand); as ordinal, sixth
מֵא֖וֹת hundred H3967
מֵא֖וֹת hundred
Strong's: H3967
Word #: 4 of 6
a hundred; also as a multiplicative and a fraction
שִׁשִּׁ֥ים sixty H8346
שִׁשִּׁ֥ים sixty
Strong's: H8346
Word #: 5 of 6
sixty
וְשִׁשָּֽׁה׃ and six H8337
וְשִׁשָּֽׁה׃ and six
Strong's: H8337
Word #: 6 of 6
six (as an overplus beyond five or the fingers of the hand); as ordinal, sixth

Analysis & Commentary

The children of Adonikam, six hundred sixty and six. This census entry records returnees from the family of Adonikam (אֲדֹנִיקָם, Adoniqam, 'my lord has arisen'). The name itself testified to covenant faith—confessing Yahweh as the risen Lord who vindicates His people. The number 666 later gained symbolic significance in Revelation 13:18, but here it simply records historical fact without numerological meaning.

The precision of census numbers throughout Ezra 2 demonstrates careful record-keeping essential for establishing tribal identity and land claims. The Hebrew term bene ('children/sons') indicates patrilineal descent, preserving genealogical continuity despite seventy years of exile. These weren't random refugees but covenant families maintaining identity through foreign domination.

Adonikam's family appears again in Ezra 8:13, where additional members join the second return under Ezra. This demonstrates that the initial return wasn't exhaustive—faithful families continued responding to God's call over successive generations. The preservation of family records through Babylonian exile represents remarkable covenant tenacity.

Historical Context

The Babylonian exile disrupted but didn't destroy Israelite genealogical consciousness. Unlike Assyrian deportation policy, which deliberately mixed populations to destroy ethnic identity, Babylonian practice allowed some community cohesion. Jewish exiles maintained family records, enabling precise census documentation when return opportunity arose.

These census lists served legal purposes beyond historical interest. Land inheritance rights depended on proving tribal and familial connections. Without such records, returnees couldn't reclaim ancestral properties or establish legitimate authority in rebuilt Jerusalem. The numbers also demonstrated fulfillment of God's promise to preserve a remnant despite judgment.

Questions for Reflection