And whosoever remaineth in any place where he sojourneth, let the men of his place help him with silver, and with gold, and with goods, and with beasts, beside the freewill offering for the house of God that is in Jerusalem.
And whosoever remaineth in any place where he sojourneth, let the men of his place help him with silver, and with gold, and with goods, and with beasts, beside the freewill offering for the house of God that is in Jerusalem. This verse establishes material support for returnees, creating partnership between those going and remaining. The verb 'help' (nasa) carries sense of lifting up or bearing a burden, indicating substantial support beyond token gesture.
The list—silver, gold, goods, beasts—mirrors Israel's exodus from Egypt (Exodus 12:35-36). This typological connection suggests the return from exile recapitulates the original exodus, forming a second redemptive moment. God orchestrates circumstances so His people leave captivity enriched.
The distinction between mandated support and 'freewill offering' recognizes different participation levels. Those remaining had obligation to support returnees, while additional offerings expressed voluntary devotion. This prevented resentment while encouraging generosity beyond minimum requirements.
Historical Context
Persian imperial policy included financial support for religious institutions, viewing this as securing divine favor and political stability. Cyrus's decree aligned with broader Persian practice while specifically advancing Jewish interests. Archaeological evidence shows Persian rulers regularly provided resources for temple construction throughout the empire.
The mention of 'beasts' was crucial for the arduous journey across Mesopotamia. Without such support, many families would lack means to make the journey or establish themselves in Judah.
The 'freewill offering' had deep roots in Jewish practice. The original tabernacle had been built through freewill offerings (Exodus 35:29), ensuring that God's house expressed genuine devotion rather than coercion.
Questions for Reflection
How does the exodus typology deepen understanding of God's redemptive patterns?
What principles for Christian giving emerge from the distinction between required and freewill offerings?
How can believers support those called to costly obedience or missionary service today?
Analysis & Commentary
And whosoever remaineth in any place where he sojourneth, let the men of his place help him with silver, and with gold, and with goods, and with beasts, beside the freewill offering for the house of God that is in Jerusalem. This verse establishes material support for returnees, creating partnership between those going and remaining. The verb 'help' (nasa) carries sense of lifting up or bearing a burden, indicating substantial support beyond token gesture.
The list—silver, gold, goods, beasts—mirrors Israel's exodus from Egypt (Exodus 12:35-36). This typological connection suggests the return from exile recapitulates the original exodus, forming a second redemptive moment. God orchestrates circumstances so His people leave captivity enriched.
The distinction between mandated support and 'freewill offering' recognizes different participation levels. Those remaining had obligation to support returnees, while additional offerings expressed voluntary devotion. This prevented resentment while encouraging generosity beyond minimum requirements.