Moreover the spirit lifted me up, and brought me unto the east gate of the LORD'S house, which looketh eastward: and behold at the door of the gate five and twenty men; among whom I saw Jaazaniah the son of Azur, and Pelatiah the son of Benaiah, princes of the people.
The Spirit lifting Ezekiel and bringing him to the east gate represents divine transportation in prophetic vision. The Hebrew ruach (רוּחַ, 'Spirit' or 'wind') indicates God's power enabling the vision. The east gate faced toward the rising sun, symbolically important as the direction of God's glory (Ezekiel 43:1-5) and also the direction from which Babylonian invaders would come.
The identification of twenty-five men, including named leaders Ja azaniah and Pelatiah, demonstrates the specificity of prophetic indictment. These were not anonymous evildoers but identifiable princes—likely members of Jerusalem's ruling council. Their presence 'at the door of the gate' suggests they were conducting official business, perhaps judicial or administrative functions. The naming of leaders emphasizes personal accountability—leadership brings heightened responsibility (James 3:1).
From a Reformed perspective, this passage illustrates that God's judgment begins with leadership ('judgment must begin at the house of God,' 1 Peter 4:17). Those entrusted with guiding God's people bear greater responsibility for the nation's spiritual condition. The twenty-five men represent the political establishment that should have led in righteousness but instead led in rebellion, making them primary targets of prophetic condemnation.
Historical Context
The east gate of the temple complex served as a major entrance, a place where leaders gathered for official functions. Archaeological remains of ancient Israelite cities show that gates functioned as judicial and administrative centers where elders met to conduct business (Ruth 4:1-11, Deuteronomy 21:19). The twenty-five men likely represented Jerusalem's political elite who survived the first deportation in 597 BC.
Jaazaniah son of Azur and Pelatiah son of Benaiah are otherwise unknown, though the names indicate Israelite heritage ('Jaazaniah' means 'Yahweh hears,' 'Pelatiah' means 'Yahweh delivers'). The irony is striking—men bearing names reflecting faith in Yahweh were leading the people in rebellion against Him. This pattern of nominal faith combined with practical apostasy characterized pre-exilic Judah and prompted prophetic condemnation throughout Jeremiah and Ezekiel.
Questions for Reflection
How does God's focus on leadership in judgment challenge those in positions of spiritual or political authority today?
What does the irony of these men's faith-based names combined with faithless actions teach about nominal versus genuine faith?
In what ways does personal identification (naming) of offenders emphasize individual accountability before God?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
The Spirit lifting Ezekiel and bringing him to the east gate represents divine transportation in prophetic vision. The Hebrew ruach (רוּחַ, 'Spirit' or 'wind') indicates God's power enabling the vision. The east gate faced toward the rising sun, symbolically important as the direction of God's glory (Ezekiel 43:1-5) and also the direction from which Babylonian invaders would come.
The identification of twenty-five men, including named leaders Ja azaniah and Pelatiah, demonstrates the specificity of prophetic indictment. These were not anonymous evildoers but identifiable princes—likely members of Jerusalem's ruling council. Their presence 'at the door of the gate' suggests they were conducting official business, perhaps judicial or administrative functions. The naming of leaders emphasizes personal accountability—leadership brings heightened responsibility (James 3:1).
From a Reformed perspective, this passage illustrates that God's judgment begins with leadership ('judgment must begin at the house of God,' 1 Peter 4:17). Those entrusted with guiding God's people bear greater responsibility for the nation's spiritual condition. The twenty-five men represent the political establishment that should have led in righteousness but instead led in rebellion, making them primary targets of prophetic condemnation.