As when a man goeth into the wood with his neighbour to hew wood, and his hand fetcheth a stroke with the axe to cut down the tree, and the head slippeth from the helve, and lighteth upon his neighbour, that he die; he shall flee unto one of those cities, and live:
As when a man goeth into the wood with his neighbour to hew wood, and his hand fetcheth a stroke with the axe to cut down the tree, and the head slippeth from the helve, and lighteth upon his neighbour, that he die; he shall flee unto one of those cities, and live. This specific example illustrates accidental killing - a common workplace accident where the axe head flies off, striking and killing a co-worker. The detailed scenario clarifies what constitutes unintentional homicide.
The example emphasizes completely unintentional nature - both men were doing normal work, no malice existed, and the death resulted from tool failure rather than negligence or carelessness. This represents pure accident without culpability for the outcome.
The promise he shall flee...and live guarantees refuge protection. Though the man caused death, lack of intent and malice means he deserves protection from revenge, not punishment. The refuge city preserves innocent life while allowing grief and justice processes to work properly.
This case law demonstrates God's mercy - even though death occurred and the victim's family suffers, executing the accidental killer would compound tragedy without serving justice.
Historical Context
Ancient tools frequently failed - axe heads could slip from handles during use. Without safety equipment or modern manufacturing standards, such accidents occurred more commonly than in contemporary contexts.
The specificity of this example helped judges and communities determine whether particular deaths qualified for refuge protection or required prosecution for murder.
Questions for Reflection
What does this specific example teach about God's concern for justice based on actual circumstances?
How does protecting accidental killers demonstrate mercy without compromising justice?
Why would executing someone for genuine accident compound tragedy rather than serve justice?
What role do specific case examples play in helping apply general legal principles?
How should grief for victims be balanced with mercy toward those who cause accidental death?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
As when a man goeth into the wood with his neighbour to hew wood, and his hand fetcheth a stroke with the axe to cut down the tree, and the head slippeth from the helve, and lighteth upon his neighbour, that he die; he shall flee unto one of those cities, and live. This specific example illustrates accidental killing - a common workplace accident where the axe head flies off, striking and killing a co-worker. The detailed scenario clarifies what constitutes unintentional homicide.
The example emphasizes completely unintentional nature - both men were doing normal work, no malice existed, and the death resulted from tool failure rather than negligence or carelessness. This represents pure accident without culpability for the outcome.
The promise he shall flee...and live guarantees refuge protection. Though the man caused death, lack of intent and malice means he deserves protection from revenge, not punishment. The refuge city preserves innocent life while allowing grief and justice processes to work properly.
This case law demonstrates God's mercy - even though death occurred and the victim's family suffers, executing the accidental killer would compound tragedy without serving justice.