Amos 8:6

Authorized King James Version

PDF

That we may buy the poor for silver, and the needy for a pair of shoes; yea, and sell the refuse of the wheat?

Original Language Analysis

לִקְנ֤וֹת That we may buy H7069
לִקְנ֤וֹת That we may buy
Strong's: H7069
Word #: 1 of 9
to erect, i.e., create; by extension, to procure, especially by purchase (causatively, sell); by implication to own
בַּכֶּ֙סֶף֙ for silver H3701
בַּכֶּ֙סֶף֙ for silver
Strong's: H3701
Word #: 2 of 9
silver (from its pale color); by implication, money
דַּלִּ֔ים the poor H1800
דַּלִּ֔ים the poor
Strong's: H1800
Word #: 3 of 9
properly, dangling, i.e., (by implication) weak or thin
וְאֶבְי֖וֹן and the needy H34
וְאֶבְי֖וֹן and the needy
Strong's: H34
Word #: 4 of 9
destitute
בַּעֲב֣וּר H5668
בַּעֲב֣וּר
Strong's: H5668
Word #: 5 of 9
properly, crossed, i.e., (abstractly) transit; used only adverbially, on account of, in order that
נַעֲלָ֑יִם for a pair of shoes H5275
נַעֲלָ֑יִם for a pair of shoes
Strong's: H5275
Word #: 6 of 9
properly, a sandal tongue; by extension a sandal or slipper (sometimes as a symbol of occupancy, a refusal to marry, or of something valueless)
וּמַפַּ֥ל the refuse H4651
וּמַפַּ֥ל the refuse
Strong's: H4651
Word #: 7 of 9
a falling off, i.e., chaff; also something pendulous, i.e., a flap
בַּ֖ר of the wheat H1250
בַּ֖ר of the wheat
Strong's: H1250
Word #: 8 of 9
grain of any kind (even while standing in the field); by extension the open country
נַשְׁבִּֽיר׃ yea and sell H7666
נַשְׁבִּֽיר׃ yea and sell
Strong's: H7666
Word #: 9 of 9
to deal in grain

Analysis & Commentary

That we may buy the poor for silver, and the needy for a pair of shoes—This verse exposes debt slavery as economic strategy. The Hebrew buy (לִקְנוֹת, liqnot) means purchase as property, and for silver (בְּכֶסֶף, bekhesef) indicates monetary debt as the mechanism. When poor Israelites couldn't repay loans (often at usurious rates), creditors enslaved them—violating Deuteronomy 15:1-18's debt forgiveness provisions and Leviticus 25:39-43's prohibition against treating fellow Israelites as slaves.

The phrase for a pair of shoes (בַּעֲבוּר נַעֲלַיִם, ba'avur na'alayim) appears in Amos 2:6, emphasizing the trivial debts triggering enslavement—people sold into bondage for amounts worth mere sandals. This reveals predatory lending: the wealthy deliberately loaned small amounts with harsh terms, then seized debtors as slaves when inevitable default occurred. They manufactured poverty to acquire cheap labor. Ruth 4:7-8 shows shoes symbolized legal transactions; here, the symbol becomes grotesque—enslavement for footwear-value debts.

The final accusation: yea, and sell the refuse of the wheat (וּמַפַּל בַּר נַשְׁבִּיר, umappal bar nashbir)—selling the sweepings, chaff, and spoiled grain unfit for consumption. Mappal (מַפָּל) means "falling, refuse, waste"—the debris swept from threshing floors, containing dirt, stones, and rotten kernels. They not only cheated on measures (verse 5) but sold contaminated products at full price, poisoning the poor they claimed to serve. This triple evil—predatory lending, debt slavery, and selling toxic food—demonstrates comprehensive contempt for covenant and neighbor.

Historical Context

Mosaic Law extensively protected debtors and the poor. Every seventh year required debt cancellation (Deuteronomy 15:1-2), prohibition against harsh lending terms (Exodus 22:25-27), and release of Hebrew slaves (Deuteronomy 15:12-15). The Jubilee year (every 50th year) restored ancestral lands and freed all slaves (Leviticus 25:8-55). These provisions prevented permanent poverty and protected family inheritance.

By Amos's time, Israel's elite ignored these laws entirely. They loaned at interest (forbidden in Exodus 22:25), seized land as collateral (violating Deuteronomy 24:6, 10-13), and kept slaves past release dates. Archaeological evidence shows land concentration in few hands—the wealthy accumulated estates by foreclosing on debtors, creating the landless underclass Amos describes. Selling refuse grain added insult to injury: not only enslaving the poor but selling them food that endangered health.

Questions for Reflection