1 Chronicles 24:2

Authorized King James Version

PDF

But Nadab and Abihu died before their father, and had no children: therefore Eleazar and Ithamar executed the priest's office.

Original Language Analysis

וַיָּ֨מָת died H4191
וַיָּ֨מָת died
Strong's: H4191
Word #: 1 of 12
to die (literally or figuratively); causatively, to kill
נָדָ֤ב But Nadab H5070
נָדָ֤ב But Nadab
Strong's: H5070
Word #: 2 of 12
nadab, the name of four israelites
וַֽאֲבִיהוּא֙ and Abihu H30
וַֽאֲבִיהוּא֙ and Abihu
Strong's: H30
Word #: 3 of 12
abihu, a son of aaron
לִפְנֵ֣י before H6440
לִפְנֵ֣י before
Strong's: H6440
Word #: 4 of 12
the face (as the part that turns); used in a great variety of applications (literally and figuratively); also (with prepositional prefix) as a preposi
אֲבִיהֶ֔ם their father H1
אֲבִיהֶ֔ם their father
Strong's: H1
Word #: 5 of 12
father, in a literal and immediate, or figurative and remote application
וּבָנִ֖ים and had no children H1121
וּבָנִ֖ים and had no children
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 6 of 12
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
לֹֽא H3808
לֹֽא
Strong's: H3808
Word #: 7 of 12
not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles
הָי֣וּ H1961
הָי֣וּ
Strong's: H1961
Word #: 8 of 12
to exist, i.e., be or become, come to pass (always emphatic, and not a mere copula or auxiliary)
לָהֶ֑ם H1992
לָהֶ֑ם
Strong's: H1992
Word #: 9 of 12
they (only used when emphatic)
וַֽיְכַהֲנ֔וּ executed the priest's office H3547
וַֽיְכַהֲנ֔וּ executed the priest's office
Strong's: H3547
Word #: 10 of 12
to officiate as a priest; figuratively, to put on regalia
אֶלְעָזָ֖ר therefore Eleazar H499
אֶלְעָזָ֖ר therefore Eleazar
Strong's: H499
Word #: 11 of 12
elazar, the name of seven israelites
וְאִֽיתָמָֽר׃ and Ithamar H385
וְאִֽיתָמָֽר׃ and Ithamar
Strong's: H385
Word #: 12 of 12
ithamar, a son of aaron

Analysis & Commentary

Theological Analysis: This passage falls within the section on Priestly divisions - 24 courses for temple service. The Hebrew term מִשְׁמָר (mishmar) - division/watch is theologically significant here, pointing to Systematic approach to ministry and worship. The Chronicler's narrative, while paralleling Samuel-Kings in places, offers a distinct theological perspective emphasizing temple worship, Levitical service, and covenant faithfulness.

Chronicles presents David not primarily as warrior-king but as worship organizer and temple planner. This verse contributes to that portrait by highlighting the spiritual dimensions of Israel's national life. The text demonstrates that true prosperity comes through proper worship and covenant obedience rather than merely military or political success.

Doctrinally, this passage teaches about Systematic approach to ministry and worship. Cross-references throughout Chronicles connect David's reign to the broader redemptive narrative, showing how God's covenant promises advance through faithful human leadership while ultimately depending on divine grace and power. The messianic implications are profound: Christ's perpetual priesthood.

Historical Context

Historical Background: This section describes events from David's reign (c. 1010-970 BCE) but was written centuries later during the Persian period (c. 450-400 BCE). The Chronicler's selectivity in retelling David's story serves his theological purposes—he omits David's sins (Bathsheba, Absalom's rebellion) while emphasizing David's worship reforms and temple preparations.

The historical setting of Priestly divisions - 24 courses for temple service occurred during Israel's united monarchy, when the nation reached its territorial and political zenith. Archaeological evidence from this period shows significant building projects and administrative development. However, the Chronicler writes for a much smaller, struggling post-exilic community, using David's golden age to inspire hope for restoration.

Ancient Near Eastern parallels show that temple construction and royal sponsorship of worship were common across cultures. However, Israel's understanding of worship centered on covenant relationship with the one true God rather than manipulation of capricious deities. This theological distinctiveness shapes the Chronicler's presentation.

Questions for Reflection