Luke 20:7
A focused desk for reading, commentary, cross-references, original language notes, and your own observations.
Luke 20:7
7 And they answered, that they could not tell whence it was.
Chapter Context
Luke 20 is a historical gospel chapter in the New Testament that explores themes of truth, mercy, salvation. Written during the late first century CE (c. 80-85 CE), this chapter should be understood within its historical context: Written when Christians needed to understand their place in the Roman world.
The chapter can be divided into several sections:
- Verses 1-5: Introduction and setting the context
- Verses 6-12: Development of key themes
- Verses 13-20: Central message and teachings
- Verses 21-47: Conclusion and application
This chapter is significant because it demonstrates God's faithfulness despite human unfaithfulness. When studying this passage, it's important to consider both its immediate context within Luke and its broader place in the scriptural canon.
Verse Study
Luke 20:7
7 And they answered, that they could not tell whence it was.
Analysis
And they answered, that they could not tell whence it was—The Greek οὐκ εἰδέναι (ouk eidenai, "not to know") reveals their cowardly evasion. This wasn't honest uncertainty but deliberate refusal to state the obvious. They claim ignorance about what they actually knew, choosing the safety of agnosticism over the risk of truth. Their "we cannot tell" is intellectual dishonesty masquerading as judicious caution.
This response reveals the moral dimension of truth-seeking. They possessed sufficient evidence to judge John's ministry—crowds, prophecies fulfilled, powerful preaching, holy lifestyle. Their profession of uncertainty wasn't lack of evidence but lack of courage. By refusing to commit, they thought to escape Jesus' trap, but instead they disqualified themselves as judges of His authority. If they couldn't discern John's obvious prophetic credentials, they had no standing to evaluate Jesus. Their evasion exposed their incompetence or dishonesty—either way, they lost authority to question Him.
Historical Context
The Sanhedrin's role included evaluating prophetic claims and protecting Israel from false prophets (Deuteronomy 13:1-5, 18:20-22). Their profession of inability to judge John's ministry was an admission of failure. In first-century Judaism, discerning true from false prophets was a core responsibility of religious leadership. Their evasion wasn't humble agnosticism but abdication of duty, revealing that political expedience had replaced spiritual discernment as their operating principle.
Reflection
- How does claiming uncertainty about clear truth become a form of moral cowardice?
- What does this evasion teach about the relationship between intellectual honesty and spiritual authority?
- In what situations are Christians today tempted to claim uncertainty rather than speak costly truth?