Passage Workspace

Jeremiah 38:1

A focused desk for reading, commentary, cross-references, original language notes, and your own observations.

Chapter Interlinear Verse Page

Jeremiah 38:1

1 Then Shephatiah the son of Mattan, and Gedaliah the son of Pashur, and Jucal the son of Shelemiah, and Pashur the son of Malchiah, heard the words that Jeremiah had spoken unto all the people, saying,

Chapter Context

Jeremiah 38 is a prophetic oracle chapter in the Old Testament that explores themes of sacrifice, fellowship, love. Written during the final years of Judah and early exile (c. 627-580 BCE), this chapter should be understood within its historical context: Prophesied during Judah's final years as Babylon became the dominant power.

The chapter can be divided into several sections:

  1. Verses 1-5: Introduction and setting the context
  2. Verses 6-12: Development of key themes
  3. Verses 13-20: Central message and teachings
  4. Verses 21-28: Conclusion and application

This chapter is significant because it addresses timeless questions about faith, suffering, and divine purpose. When studying this passage, it's important to consider both its immediate context within Jeremiah and its broader place in the scriptural canon.

Verse Study

Jeremiah 38:1

1 Then Shephatiah the son of Mattan, and Gedaliah the son of Pashur, and Jucal the son of Shelemiah, and Pashur the son of Malchiah, heard the words that Jeremiah had spoken unto all the people, saying,

Analysis

Then Shephatiah the son of Mattan, and Gedaliah the son of Pashur, and Jucal the son of Shelemiah, and Pashur the son of Malchiah, heard the words that Jeremiah had spoken unto all the people, saying, This verse introduces the hostile officials who would orchestrate Jeremiah's persecution. The careful genealogical identification establishes these men as prominent figures in Zedekiah's court—not random opponents but influential leaders. Their collective opposition represents institutional resistance to God's word, paralleling Jesus' confrontation with the Sanhedrin (Mark 14:53-65).

The phrase "heard the words that Jeremiah had spoken" (vayishme'u... et-hadevarim) emphasizes they had direct knowledge of the prophecy. Their response wasn't based on rumor but firsthand hearing—making their opposition more culpable. They understood the message clearly yet rejected it, illustrating the hardness Jesus describes: "He who has ears to hear, let him hear" (Matthew 11:15). Hearing without heeding demonstrates spiritual deafness.

Theologically, this verse illustrates:

  1. True prophecy often provokes institutional opposition
  2. spiritual blindness can afflict the educated and powerful
  3. collective agreement against God's word doesn't validate opposition—truth isn't decided by majority vote
  4. those entrusted with leadership bear greater responsibility for response to revelation (James 3:1).

The Reformed emphasis on the noetic effects of sin finds vivid illustration here—these officials' minds were darkened, preventing right response to divine truth.

Historical Context

These officials served in the final chaotic years of Judah's monarchy under Zedekiah (597-586 BCE). Gedaliah son of Pashur was likely related to the Pashur who earlier persecuted Jeremiah (20:1-6). This suggests an ongoing pattern of familial and institutional resistance spanning years. The repetition of opposition across generations demonstrates entrenched spiritual rebellion.

Archaeological discoveries, including the Lachish Letters (ostraca from this period), reveal the military and political desperation during Jerusalem's final siege. Officials like these faced impossible choices: surrender to Babylon (as Jeremiah advised) or resist to the death (the nationalistic position). Their opposition to Jeremiah reflects not merely theological disagreement but political calculus—his prophecies undermined war morale. Yet their pragmatic concerns couldn't justify rejecting God's revealed will.

Reflection

  • How does institutional or group opposition to biblical truth today mirror these officials' resistance to Jeremiah?
  • In what ways might pragmatic or political concerns tempt us to compromise or silence unpopular biblical truths?
  • How does understanding the genealogical continuity of opposition (Pashur's son continuing his father's hostility) warn us about generational spiritual patterns?

Word Studies

  • Word: דָּבָר (Davar) H1697 - Word, thing, matter

Original Language

וַיִּשְׁמַ֞ע H8085 שְׁפַטְיָ֣ה H8203 בֶּן H1121 מַתָּ֗ן H4977 וּגְדַלְיָ֙הוּ֙ H1436 בֶּן H1121 וּפַשְׁח֖וּר H6583 וְיוּכַל֙ H3116 בֶּן H1121 שֶׁ֣לֶמְיָ֔הוּ H8018 וּפַשְׁח֖וּר H6583 בֶּן H1121 +10