Passage Workspace

Ezra 2:31

A focused desk for reading, commentary, cross-references, original language notes, and your own observations.

Chapter Interlinear Verse Page

Ezra 2:31

31 The children of the other Elam, a thousand two hundred fifty and four.

Chapter Context

Ezra 2 is a historical narrative chapter in the Old Testament that explores themes of hope, fellowship, covenant. Written during the post-exilic return (c. 458-440 BCE), this chapter should be understood within its historical context: The Persian Empire allowed religious freedom while maintaining political control.

The chapter can be divided into several sections:

  1. Verses 1-5: Introduction and setting the context
  2. Verses 6-12: Development of key themes
  3. Verses 13-20: Central message and teachings
  4. Verses 21-70: Conclusion and application

This chapter is significant because it establishes important theological principles that resonate throughout Scripture. When studying this passage, it's important to consider both its immediate context within Ezra and its broader place in the scriptural canon.

Verse Study

Ezra 2:31

31 The children of the other Elam, a thousand two hundred fifty and four.

Analysis

The children of the other Elam, a thousand two hundred fifty and four. The designation 'the other Elam' (עֵילָם אַחֵר, Elam acher) distinguishes this group from another Elam mentioned earlier (Ezra 2:7, with 1,254 members—interestingly, the same number). Elam (עֵילָם, Elam, meaning 'eternity' or 'hidden') was both a family name and a powerful ancient kingdom east of Babylon. The biblical Elam descended from Shem (Genesis 10:22), making Elamites distant relatives of Israel.

The repetition of 1,254 for both Elam groups presents textual curiosity. Some scholars suggest scribal duplication, others that two distinct Elam families coincidentally had identical numbers. Regardless, the phrase 'the other Elam' indicates multiple communities bearing this name, requiring distinction. This demonstrates how common certain names were, necessitating qualifiers like 'the other' to maintain clarity.

Theologically, the substantial number (1,254) shows Elam was a significant family contributing notably to the restoration. The shared name with a foreign kingdom illustrates cultural complexity—Israelites bore names connecting them to broader ancient Near Eastern context yet maintained distinct covenant identity. Though associated linguistically with pagan Elam, these families worshiped Yahweh exclusively.

Historical Context

Ancient Elam was a powerful kingdom in southwestern Iran, frequently interacting with Mesopotamian powers. The Elamites sacked Ur (c. 2004 BC) and later allied with Babylon against Assyria. However, the biblical Elam in Ezra refers to Israelite families, not the nation. These families may have been named after the ancestral Elam (Genesis 10:22) or possibly had ancestral connections to the region. The need to specify 'the other Elam' shows how genealogical records maintained precision, distinguishing between similarly-named groups. Such careful record-keeping enabled accurate property allocation and verification of priestly lineages upon return, essential for covenant community functioning.

Reflection

  • How does the distinction between 'Elam' and 'the other Elam' illustrate the importance of precision in maintaining community records and identity?
  • What does the large number (1,254) teach about how God uses substantial groups alongside small remnants?
  • How can believers maintain both connection to cultural heritage and distinctive covenant identity?

Cross-References

Original Language

בְּנֵי֙ H1121 עֵילָ֣ם H5867 אַחֵ֔ר H312 אֶ֕לֶף H505 מָאתַ֖יִם H3967 חֲמִשִּׁ֥ים H2572 וְאַרְבָּעָֽה׃ H702