Passage Workspace

Acts 13:37

A focused desk for reading, commentary, cross-references, original language notes, and your own observations.

Chapter Interlinear Verse Page

Acts 13:37

37 But he, whom God raised again, saw no corruption.

Chapter Context

Acts 13 is a historical narrative chapter in the New Testament that explores themes of mercy, holiness, sacrifice. Written during the late first century CE (c. 80-85 CE), this chapter should be understood within its historical context: Chronicles Christianity's spread across the Roman Empire despite official and unofficial opposition.

The chapter can be divided into several sections:

  1. Verses 1-5: Introduction and setting the context
  2. Verses 6-12: Development of key themes
  3. Verses 13-20: Central message and teachings
  4. Verses 21-52: Conclusion and application

This chapter is significant because it contributes to the biblical metanarrative of redemption. When studying this passage, it's important to consider both its immediate context within Acts and its broader place in the scriptural canon.

Verse Study

Acts 13:37

37 But he, whom God raised again, saw no corruption.

Analysis

But he, whom God raised again, saw no corruption (διαφθοράν, diaphthoran)—Paul's climactic contrast in his synagogue sermon. While David saw corruption (13:36), Jesus did not. The Greek diaphthora means decay, dissolution, the biological decomposition every human body undergoes.

This resurrection proof was central to apostolic preaching (Acts 2:27-31). Peter used the same Psalm 16:10 argument at Pentecost: David's tomb was with us unto this day (2:29), but Christ's tomb was empty. Paul reasons: David died, was buried, and his body decayed—therefore Psalm 16 must speak of David's greater Son. The incorruptible resurrection body proves Jesus is the Holy One of God, vindicating His messianic claims and securing our justification (Romans 4:25).

Historical Context

Paul preached this in the synagogue at Pisidian Antioch (c. AD 47-48) during his first missionary journey. His careful exegesis of Psalm 16:10 reflects rabbinic interpretive methods, arguing from Scripture to prove Jesus is the promised Messiah. The synagogue audience would have known David's tomb in Jerusalem and understood Paul's logic.

Reflection

  • How does the physical resurrection of Jesus (no bodily corruption) serve as proof of His deity and vindication?
  • Why was the argument from David's decayed body versus Christ's incorruptible body so persuasive to first-century Jews?

Word Studies

  • God: Θεός (Theos) G2316 - God

Cross-References

Original Language

ὃν G3739 δὲ G1161 G3588 θεὸς G2316 ἤγειρεν G1453 οὐκ G3756 εἶδεν G1492 διαφθοράν G1312