Numbers 7:76
One kid of the goats for a sin offering:
Original Language Analysis
Historical Context
The sin offering was instituted in Leviticus 4-5 for unintentional sins and ritual impurity. Unlike the burnt offering (total consecration) or peace offering (fellowship), the sin offering addressed the constant reality of human sinfulness in God's presence.
Questions for Reflection
- How does the mandatory nature of the sin offering challenge the modern assumption that confession and repentance are optional spiritual disciplines?
- What does the requirement for each tribe to bring its own sin offering teach about corporate versus individual responsibility for sin?
- Why did God choose the goat (rather than a lamb or bullock) specifically for the sin offering in this context?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
One kid of the goats for a sin offering (שְׂעִיר־עִזִּים אֶחָד לְחַטָּאת, se'ir-izim echad lechatat)—The male goat (se'ir) served as the chatat (חַטָּאת, sin offering), addressing unintentional transgression and ceremonial defilement. Unlike the burnt offering (voluntary consecration), the sin offering was mandatory, acknowledging that even covenant people require ongoing purification.
The goat prefigures Christ as the sin-bearer (Leviticus 16, Isaiah 53:6, 2 Corinthians 5:21). The singular "one kid" emphasizes that each tribe bears corporate responsibility for sin—there is no national offering sufficient without personal participation. The blood was applied to the altar's horns (Leviticus 4:25), symbolizing the power of atonement to sanctify worship.