Numbers 11:10
Then Moses heard the people weep throughout their families, every man in the door of his tent: and the anger of the LORD was kindled greatly; Moses also was displeased.
Original Language Analysis
Historical Context
The public nature of the complaint ('every man in the door of his tent') indicates this was coordinated mass protest, not spontaneous individual dissatisfaction. Ancient Near Eastern cultures recognized the tent door as the place of public interaction and decision-making (compare Abraham at his tent door, Genesis 18:1). The family-by-family organization suggests the complaint spread through tribal and clan structures, making it a national movement rather than isolated murmuring. This public rebellion directly challenged Moses' leadership and God's provision, creating a crisis that required divine intervention (verses 16-17).
Questions for Reflection
- How does the organized, public nature of Israel's complaint illustrate how individual sin can become corporate rebellion when unchecked?
- What does Moses' displeasure alongside God's anger teach about the proper pastoral response to congregation sin—neither excusing it nor abandoning the people?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
This verse describes Moses hearing 'the people weep throughout their families' (Hebrew habocheh lemishpechotav, הַבֹּכֶה לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָיו), indicating organized, communal complaint—not isolated individuals but entire family groups engaging in public lamentation. The phrase 'every man in the door of his tent' suggests deliberate display: they positioned themselves visibly to ensure their complaint would be heard and noticed. This wasn't private grief but public protest against God's provision.
The text states 'the anger of the LORD was kindled greatly,' emphasizing the severity of divine displeasure. God's wrath wasn't arbitrary but righteous response to brazen ingratitude. The people had food (manna), protection (pillar of cloud/fire), leadership (Moses), and God's presence (tabernacle)—yet they wept as though abandoned. Their complaint wasn't about genuine need but about preference—they wanted Egyptian food (verse 5), not the bread God provided.
'Moses also was displeased' reveals the burden leadership under rebellious people brings. The godly leader grieves both for God's dishonor and for the people's spiritual danger. Moses' displeasure wasn't merely personal offense but holy indignation at sin combined with pastoral grief. This anticipates Christ's grief over Jerusalem's hardness (Matthew 23:37) and the apostolic burden for wayward churches (2 Corinthians 11:28-29).