Micah 1:14

Authorized King James Version

PDF

Therefore shalt thou give presents to Moresheth-gath: the houses of Achzib shall be a lie to the kings of Israel.

Original Language Analysis

לָכֵן֙ H3651
לָכֵן֙
Strong's: H3651
Word #: 1 of 11
properly, set upright; hence (figuratively as adjective) just; but usually (as adverb or conjunction) rightly or so (in various applications to manner
תִּתְּנִ֣י Therefore shalt thou give H5414
תִּתְּנִ֣י Therefore shalt thou give
Strong's: H5414
Word #: 2 of 11
to give, used with greatest latitude of application (put, make, etc.)
שִׁלּוּחִ֔ים presents H7964
שִׁלּוּחִ֔ים presents
Strong's: H7964
Word #: 3 of 11
(only in plural) a dismissal, i.e., (of a wife) divorce (especially the document); also (of a daughter) dower
עַ֖ל H5921
עַ֖ל
Strong's: H5921
Word #: 4 of 11
above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applications
מוֹרֶ֣שֶׁת H0
מוֹרֶ֣שֶׁת
Strong's: H0
Word #: 5 of 11
גַּ֑ת to Moreshethgath H4182
גַּ֑ת to Moreshethgath
Strong's: H4182
Word #: 6 of 11
moresheth-gath, a place in palestine
בָּתֵּ֤י the houses H1004
בָּתֵּ֤י the houses
Strong's: H1004
Word #: 7 of 11
a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etc.)
אַכְזִיב֙ of Achzib H392
אַכְזִיב֙ of Achzib
Strong's: H392
Word #: 8 of 11
akzib, the name of two places in palestine
לְאַכְזָ֔ב shall be a lie H391
לְאַכְזָ֔ב shall be a lie
Strong's: H391
Word #: 9 of 11
falsehood; by implication treachery
לְמַלְכֵ֖י to the kings H4428
לְמַלְכֵ֖י to the kings
Strong's: H4428
Word #: 10 of 11
a king
יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃ of Israel H3478
יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃ of Israel
Strong's: H3478
Word #: 11 of 11
he will rule as god; jisral, a symbolical name of jacob; also (typically) of his posterity

Analysis & Commentary

Therefore shalt thou give presents to Moresheth-gath (לָכֵן תִּתְּנִי שִׁלּוּחִים עַל־מוֹרֶשֶׁת גַּת, lakhen titteni shilluchim al-Moresheth Gat). מוֹרֶשֶׁת גַּת (Moresheth-Gath) was Micah's hometown (1:1), located near the Philistine city Gath. שִׁלּוּחִים (shilluchim) means sending away, parting gifts, or farewell presents—the kind given to a departing daughter (Genesis 31:16). The wordplay suggests מוֹרֶשֶׁת (Moresheth) sounds like מְאֹרָשָׂה (me'orasah, betrothed)—Jerusalem must give parting gifts as if divorcing a betrothed bride.

The houses of Achzib shall be a lie to the kings of Israel (בָּתֵּי אַכְזִיב לְאַכְזָב לְמַלְכֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל, bottei Akhziv le-akhzav le-malkhei Yisrael). אַכְזִיב (Akhziv) means "deceptive/lying"; the town becomes an אַכְזָב (akhzav, deception)—like a wadi that promises water but runs dry (Jeremiah 15:18; Job 6:15-20). Kings expected Achzib's support but found betrayal or collapse. The wordplay emphasizes covenant unfaithfulness produces unreliable relationships—you reap what you sow (Galatians 6:7).

Micah personalizes judgment—his own hometown faces devastation. Prophets didn't deliver abstract theology but costly, personal truth. Jeremiah's hometown Anathoth rejected him (Jeremiah 11:21-23); Jesus noted prophets aren't honored in hometowns (Luke 4:24). Micah's willingness to prophesy against Moresheth-Gath demonstrates prophetic integrity—he valued truth over popularity, God's word over hometown loyalty. The parting gifts symbolize irreversible loss—what was intimately connected must be released in judgment.

Historical Context

Moresheth-Gath's location is identified with Tel Goded, about 25 miles southwest of Jerusalem near the Philistine border. The compound name (Moresheth-Gath) indicates proximity to the Philistine city Gath. This region saw repeated conflict between Judah and Philistia, making it culturally hybrid and militarily vulnerable. During Sennacherib's 701 BC invasion, border towns like Moresheth bore initial assault.

Achzib (possibly Tell el-Beida) was another Shephelah town. The prophet's wordplays emphasize that these towns—including his own birthplace—wouldn't escape judgment. The phrase "kings of Israel" in Micah sometimes refers to Judean kings (as Northern Israel had already fallen by 722 BC). The message: covenant violation produces systemic unreliability. Towns that should support the kingdom become deceptive disappointments. The theological principle extends beyond geography—unfaithfulness corrupts all relationships, personal and political.

Questions for Reflection