Mark 10:9

Authorized King James Version

PDF

What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

Original Language Analysis

What G3739
What
Strong's: G3739
Word #: 1 of 8
the relatively (sometimes demonstrative) pronoun, who, which, what, that
οὖν therefore G3767
οὖν therefore
Strong's: G3767
Word #: 2 of 8
(adverbially) certainly, or (conjunctionally) accordingly
G3588
Strong's: G3588
Word #: 3 of 8
the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in english idiom)
θεὸς God G2316
θεὸς God
Strong's: G2316
Word #: 4 of 8
a deity, especially (with g3588) the supreme divinity; figuratively, a magistrate; exceedingly (by hebraism)
συνέζευξεν hath joined together G4801
συνέζευξεν hath joined together
Strong's: G4801
Word #: 5 of 8
to yoke together, i.e., (figuratively) conjoin (in marriage)
ἄνθρωπος man G444
ἄνθρωπος man
Strong's: G444
Word #: 6 of 8
man-faced, i.e., a human being
μὴ not G3361
μὴ not
Strong's: G3361
Word #: 7 of 8
(adverb) not, (conjunction) lest; also (as an interrogative implying a negative answer (whereas g3756 expects an affirmative one)) whether
χωριζέτω let G5563
χωριζέτω let
Strong's: G5563
Word #: 8 of 8
to place room between, i.e., part; reflexively, to go away

Analysis & Commentary

Jesus commanded: 'What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder' (ὃ οὖν ὁ θεὸς συνέζευξεν ἄνθρωπος μὴ χωριζέτω). The verb 'joined together' (synezeuxen, συνέζευξεν) means yoked or paired—God actively unites husband and wife. The aorist tense indicates definitive, completed action at marriage. God, not merely human agreement, creates marital bond. Therefore 'let not man put asunder' (chōrizetō, χωριζέτω, separate or divorce). Human beings shouldn't dissolve what God established. This principle grounds Christian opposition to no-fault divorce—marriage isn't human institution dissolvable by mutual consent but divine ordinance requiring God's authority to dissolve. The only exception Jesus allowed was sexual immorality (Matthew 19:9), and even then as permission, not command. God hates divorce (Malachi 2:16) because it violates His creation design and images Christ-church union.

Historical Context

First-century practice allowed easy divorce, especially under Hillel's interpretation permitting divorce for trivial causes. Jesus' restrictive teaching shocked hearers—disciples responded, 'If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry' (Matthew 19:10). This reveals how radical Jesus' teaching was. Greco-Roman world practiced easy divorce; Jewish law (Deut 24:1-4) regulated it. Jesus returned to Genesis, asserting creational permanence over legal accommodation. The early church maintained Jesus' strict standard despite cultural pressure. Augustine developed theology of marriage's indissolubility; Reformers debated whether desertion (1 Cor 7:15) constituted second exception. Contemporary evangelicalism often adopts cultural accommodation rather than Jesus' creational norm.

Questions for Reflection

Related Resources

Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.

Topics

People

Study Resources

Bible Stories