Lamentations 3:36

Authorized King James Version

PDF

To subvert a man in his cause, the Lord approveth not.

Original Language Analysis

לְעַוֵּ֤ת To subvert H5791
לְעַוֵּ֤ת To subvert
Strong's: H5791
Word #: 1 of 6
to wrest
אָדָם֙ a man H120
אָדָם֙ a man
Strong's: H120
Word #: 2 of 6
ruddy i.e., a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.)
בְּרִיב֔וֹ in his cause H7379
בְּרִיב֔וֹ in his cause
Strong's: H7379
Word #: 3 of 6
a contest (personal or legal)
אֲדֹנָ֖י the Lord H136
אֲדֹנָ֖י the Lord
Strong's: H136
Word #: 4 of 6
the lord (used as a proper name of god only)
לֹ֥א H3808
לֹ֥א
Strong's: H3808
Word #: 5 of 6
not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles
רָאָֽה׃ approveth H7200
רָאָֽה׃ approveth
Strong's: H7200
Word #: 6 of 6
to see, literally or figuratively (in numerous applications, direct and implied, transitive, intransitive and causative)

Analysis & Commentary

The series concludes: "To subvert a man in his cause, the Lord approveth not." The Hebrew le-awet adam be-rivo Adonai lo ra'ah uses awat (עָוַת), meaning to make crooked, pervert, or subvert. Riv (רִיב) means lawsuit, dispute, or legal case. The phrase describes twisting someone's legal case against them—judicial corruption.

The climax comes with "the Lord approveth not" (Adonai lo ra'ah). The verb ra'ah (רָאָה) means to see, perceive, or approve. God doesn't approve or look favorably upon such actions. The covenant name Adonai (Lord, Master) emphasizes His authority to judge these matters.

This verse completes the thought begun in verse 34. God doesn't approve of:

  1. crushing prisoners (verse 34)
  2. perverting individual rights (verse 35), or
  3. subverting legal cases (verse 36).

Though He permits such things for disciplinary purposes, He disapproves and will judge those who do them. This establishes crucial theological principles: God's permissive will differs from His approved will; divine sovereignty doesn't negate human responsibility. Christ embodies these principles—suffering unjust subversion while trusting the righteous Judge (1 Peter 2:23).

Historical Context

Legal subversion was endemic in both pre-exilic Judah and exilic Babylon. Micah 7:3 describes corrupt Judean judges: "The prince asketh, and the judge asketh for a reward." Amos 5:12 condemns those who afflict the just and take bribes.

In Babylon, exiles had no legal standing or protections. They were subject to arbitrary treatment without recourse. Daniel 6 illustrates how political enemies manipulated law to subvert Daniel's case. Though God delivered Daniel, the incident shows the pervasive injustice of imperial legal systems.

Yet Lamentations maintains that God observes all. He approved none of the judicial corruption—neither Judah's pre-exilic perversions nor Babylon's exilic subversions. This dual judgment demonstrates God's impartial holiness. James 2:1-9 later teaches that showing partiality in judgment sins against God's law. Perfect justice will come only in Christ's kingdom (Psalm 96:10, 13).

Questions for Reflection

Related Resources

Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.

Topics