Joshua 19:1
And the second lot came forth to Simeon, even for the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families: and their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah.
Original Language Analysis
Historical Context
Simeon's enclave within Judah lay in the Negev region of southern Canaan, an arid zone receiving less than 8 inches of annual rainfall. This marginal land supported sparse population and required semi-nomadic pastoralism rather than intensive agriculture. Archaeological surveys show scattered settlement in the Negev during Iron Age I (1200-1000 BCE), consistent with Simeon's limited presence.
The tribal absorption of Simeon into Judah occurred gradually. The Simeonite genealogy in 1 Chronicles 4:24-43 records expansion southward and eastward into Edomite and Amalekite territories, suggesting the tribe sought identity through conquest outside Judah's core. By the monarchy period, Simeon had essentially disappeared as a distinct entity—2 Chronicles 15:9 and 34:6 mention Simeonites living in northern Israel, indicating dispersion.
Jacob's prophecy in Genesis 49:5-7 condemned Simeon and Levi for their violence at Shechem, where they massacred the city after Dinah's defilement (Genesis 34). The fulfillment came differently for each tribe: Levi was scattered as priests with no territorial inheritance but received honor through service; Simeon was scattered within Judah's borders and gradually lost tribal identity. God's justice was precise—the crime was punished, but not identically for both perpetrators.
Questions for Reflection
- How does Simeon's absorption into Judah demonstrate that God's prophetic judgments are both certain and precise, fulfilled across generations?
- What does Simeon's fate teach about how violence and vengeance, even when provoked, can have lasting consequences for our descendants?
- How can we see God's mercy even in judgment—Simeon wasn't destroyed but continued to exist, though diminished—and what does this reveal about divine discipline?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
And the second lot came forth to Simeon, even for the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families: and their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah.
The goral (גּוֹרָל, "lot") was cast to determine Simeon's inheritance, demonstrating Israel's dependence on divine providence rather than human manipulation. That the "second lot" fell to Simeon is significant—Judah received the first (15:1), followed immediately by Simeon, fulfilling the brothers' permanent association predicted in Jacob's prophecy. The phrase within the inheritance of the children of Judah marks Simeon's unique status: alone among the tribes, they received no independent territory but were absorbed into another tribe's allotment.
This arrangement directly fulfills Jacob's deathbed prophecy: "I will divide them in Jacob, and scatter them in Israel" (Genesis 49:7). Simeon and Levi were cursed for their violent destruction of Shechem (Genesis 34:25-31). While Levi's scattering was redeemed through priestly service (Deuteronomy 33:8-11), Simeon's dispersion led to gradual tribal dissolution. By David's time, Simeon had largely been absorbed into Judah (1 Chronicles 4:24-43), and the tribe receives no blessing in Deuteronomy 33.
The Hebrew b'toch nachalat (בְּתוֹךְ נַחֲלַת, "within the inheritance") emphasizes Simeon's dependent position. They possessed cities but no autonomous tribal territory—a prophetic judgment that didn't destroy them but limited their influence and identity, demonstrating how God's discipline fulfills His word across generations.