Job 9:29

Authorized King James Version

PDF

If I be wicked, why then labour I in vain?

Original Language Analysis

אָנֹכִ֥י H595
אָנֹכִ֥י
Strong's: H595
Word #: 1 of 6
i
אֶרְשָׁ֑ע If I be wicked H7561
אֶרְשָׁ֑ע If I be wicked
Strong's: H7561
Word #: 2 of 6
to be (causatively, do or declare) wrong; by implication, to disturb, violate
לָמָּה H4100
לָמָּה
Strong's: H4100
Word #: 3 of 6
properly, interrogative what? (including how? why? when?); but also exclamation, what! (including how!), or indefinitely what (including whatever, and
זֶּ֝֗ה H2088
זֶּ֝֗ה
Strong's: H2088
Word #: 4 of 6
the masculine demonstrative pronoun, this or that
הֶ֣בֶל I in vain H1892
הֶ֣בֶל I in vain
Strong's: H1892
Word #: 5 of 6
emptiness or vanity; figuratively, something transitory and unsatisfactory; often used as an adverb
אִיגָֽע׃ why then labour H3021
אִיגָֽע׃ why then labour
Strong's: H3021
Word #: 6 of 6
properly, to gasp; hence, to be exhausted, to tire, to toil

Analysis & Commentary

If I be wicked, why then labour I in vain? (אָנֹכִי אֶרְשָׁע לָמָּה־זֶּה הֶבֶל אִיגָע, anokhi ersha lamah-zeh hevel iga)—Job's logic is devastating: if God has already condemned me as wicked (rasha, רָשָׁע), why should I continue striving for righteousness? The phrase 'labour I in vain' uses hevel (הֶבֶל, 'vanity' or 'breath') from Ecclesiastes—meaningless, futile effort. The verb 'labour' (yaga, יָגַע) means to toil, work to exhaustion, struggle.

Job poses the moral hazard inherent in his situation: if righteousness brings no vindication and suffering comes regardless of behavior, what motivation remains for godliness? This isn't abandoning righteousness but exposing the friends' theology's bankruptcy. If suffering always indicates sin (as they claim), and the innocent suffer anyway (as Job experiences), then morality becomes meaningless. This question anticipates Paul's argument in Romans: justification must be by faith, not works, because no one can achieve righteousness sufficient for vindication (Romans 3:20-24). Job glimpses the need for a righteousness outside himself.

Historical Context

The retribution theology Job's friends espouse—righteousness brings prosperity, sin brings suffering—dominated ancient Near Eastern thought. Job's question exposes this system's moral bankruptcy: if the innocent suffer anyway, why pursue righteousness? This philosophical crisis drove Israel toward understanding grace, substitution, and future resurrection rather than strict earthly retribution. The book of Job prepared Israel for the gospel by demolishing works-righteousness.

Questions for Reflection