Job 36:8

And if they be bound in fetters, and be holden in cords of affliction;

Word-by-Word Analysis

וְאִם

H518

used very widely as demonstrative, lo!; interrogative, whether?; or conditional, if, although; also oh that!, when; hence, as a negative, not

אֲסוּרִ֥ים

H631

And if they be bound

to yoke or hitch; by analogy, to fasten in any sense, to join battle

בַּזִּקִּ֑ים

H2131

in fetters

properly, what leaps forth, i.e., flash of fire, or a burning arrow; also (from the original sense of the root) a bond

יִ֝לָּכְד֗וּן

H3920

and be holden

to catch (in a net, trap or pit); generally, to capture or occupy; also to choose (by lot); figuratively, to cohere

בְּחַבְלֵי

H2256

in cords

ruin

עֹֽנִי׃

H6040

of affliction

depression, i.e., misery

Analysis

Within the broader context of Job, this passage highlights salvation through declarative statements that establish theological truth. The theological weight of divine revelation connects to fundamental Christian doctrine about divine revelation, contributing to our understanding of God's nature and relationship with humanity. This verse contributes to the book's overall argument by building upon previous themes while advancing the overall message of Job.

Historical Context

The literary and historical milieu of the literary conventions and historical circumstances of biblical literature shapes this text's meaning. The historical development of salvation within the theological tradition of Job Understanding the ancient worldview that shaped the author's theological expression helps modern readers appreciate why the author emphasizes divine revelation in this particular way.

Questions for Reflection

How might the original audience's understanding of divine revelation differ from modern interpretations, and what bridges can be built between ancient meaning and contemporary application?
In what ways does understanding divine revelation in its original context challenge or deepen contemporary Christian thinking about salvation?
How does this verse's literary context within Job chapter 36 illuminate its theological significance, and what does this teach us about biblical interpretation?