Job 24:25

Authorized King James Version

PDF

And if it be not so now, who will make me a liar, and make my speech nothing worth?

Original Language Analysis

וְאִם H518
וְאִם
Strong's: H518
Word #: 1 of 8
used very widely as demonstrative, lo!; interrogative, whether?; or conditional, if, although; also oh that!, when; hence, as a negative, not
לֹ֣א H3808
לֹ֣א
Strong's: H3808
Word #: 2 of 8
not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles
אֵ֭פוֹ And if it be not so now H645
אֵ֭פוֹ And if it be not so now
Strong's: H645
Word #: 3 of 8
strictly a demonstrative particle, here; but used of time, now or then
מִ֣י H4310
מִ֣י
Strong's: H4310
Word #: 4 of 8
who? (occasionally, by a peculiar idiom, of things); also (indefinitely) whoever; often used in oblique construction with prefix or suffix
יַכְזִיבֵ֑נִי me a liar H3576
יַכְזִיבֵ֑נִי me a liar
Strong's: H3576
Word #: 5 of 8
to lie (i.e., deceive), literally or figuratively
וְיָשֵׂ֥ם and make H7760
וְיָשֵׂ֥ם and make
Strong's: H7760
Word #: 6 of 8
to put (used in a great variety of applications, literal, figurative, inferentially, and elliptically)
לְ֝אַ֗ל nothing worth H408
לְ֝אַ֗ל nothing worth
Strong's: H408
Word #: 7 of 8
not (the qualified negation, used as a deprecative); once (job 24:25) as a noun, nothing
מִלָּתִֽי׃ my speech H4405
מִלָּתִֽי׃ my speech
Strong's: H4405
Word #: 8 of 8
a word; collectively, a discourse; figuratively, a topic

Analysis & Commentary

Job challenges anyone to disprove his observations: "And if it be not so now, who will make me a liar, and make my speech nothing worth?" The conditional "if not so" questions his arguments' validity. The verb kazav (כָּזַב, "make me a liar") means to prove false or deceptive. The phrase "make my speech nothing worth" uses al-belima (אַל־בְּלִימָה), meaning futility or worthlessness. Job stakes his credibility on empirical observation: the wicked often prosper while the righteous suffer. From a Reformed perspective, this demonstrates intellectual honesty in theology—faith must engage reality, not deny it. Job's willingness to be proven wrong shows genuine pursuit of truth rather than defense of position. This anticipates the Berean spirit (Acts 17:11) of examining Scripture to verify claims. Yet Job's challenge will ultimately be answered not by refuting his observations but by God revealing purposes transcending simple retribution. Truth involves both accurate observation and theological interpretation.

Historical Context

Ancient wisdom discourse involved challenges to debate and prove claims (similar to Job 13:22, where Job challenges God to debate). Intellectual rigor and evidence-based reasoning weren't foreign to ancient thought. However, Job's speeches show tension between empirical observation (what we see) and theological tradition (what we've been taught). This tension persists in all generations when experience seems to contradict doctrine.

Questions for Reflection