And Hananiah spake in the presence of all the people, saying, Thus saith the LORD; Even so will I break the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon from the neck of all nations within the space of two full years. And the prophet Jeremiah went his way.
And Hananiah spake in the presence of all the people, saying, Thus saith the LORD; Even so will I break the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon from the neck of all nations within the space of two full years (כֹּה אָמַר יְהוָה כָּכָה אֶשְׁבֹּר אֶת־עֹל נְבֻכַדְנֶאצַּר מֶלֶךְ־בָּבֶל בְּעוֹד שְׁנָתַיִם יָמִים מֵעַל צַוַּאר כָּל־הַגּוֹיִם, koh amar YHWH kakah eshbor et-ol n'vukhadnetsar melekh-bavel b'od sh'natayim yamim me'al tsavvar kol-haggoyim)—Hananiah invokes divine authority (כֹּה אָמַר יְהוָה, 'Thus saith the LORD') for his optimistic timeline. The comparison כָּכָה (kak'ah, 'just like this') links broken wooden yoke to promised broken Babylonian empire. Within the space of two full years (בְּעוֹד שְׁנָתַיִם יָמִים, b'od sh'natayim yamim) sets specific deadline. And the prophet Jeremiah went his way (וַיֵּלֶךְ יִרְמְיָהוּ הַנָּבִיא לְדַרְכּוֹ, vayyelekh yirm'yahu hannavi l'darko)—Jeremiah departs without immediate response.
Jeremiah's departure shows wisdom: not every false claim requires instant rebuttal. Sometimes truth needs time to formulate proper response. Jeremiah waits for divine instruction rather than reacting emotionally. Hananiah's specific timeline would eventually expose him—either events vindicate him (they won't) or time proves him false. Faithful ministry sometimes requires patience, letting lies hang themselves with their own specifics.
Historical Context
Hananiah's two-year prediction (593-591 BC) would be tested by events. Babylon didn't fall; instead, it grew stronger, ultimately destroying Jerusalem in 586 BC. Hananiah died within the year (28:17), never seeing his prophecy's failure. His specific timeline, meant to inspire confidence, became his undoing. False prophets often make falsifiable predictions; truth requires patience to let time expose lies.
Questions for Reflection
When should you immediately refute false teaching versus waiting for time to expose it?
How do specific predictions make theological claims testable?
What does Jeremiah's departure teach about not needing last word in every argument?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
And Hananiah spake in the presence of all the people, saying, Thus saith the LORD; Even so will I break the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon from the neck of all nations within the space of two full years (כֹּה אָמַר יְהוָה כָּכָה אֶשְׁבֹּר אֶת־עֹל נְבֻכַדְנֶאצַּר מֶלֶךְ־בָּבֶל בְּעוֹד שְׁנָתַיִם יָמִים מֵעַל צַוַּאר כָּל־הַגּוֹיִם, koh amar YHWH kakah eshbor et-ol n'vukhadnetsar melekh-bavel b'od sh'natayim yamim me'al tsavvar kol-haggoyim)—Hananiah invokes divine authority (כֹּה אָמַר יְהוָה, 'Thus saith the LORD') for his optimistic timeline. The comparison כָּכָה (kak'ah, 'just like this') links broken wooden yoke to promised broken Babylonian empire. Within the space of two full years (בְּעוֹד שְׁנָתַיִם יָמִים, b'od sh'natayim yamim) sets specific deadline. And the prophet Jeremiah went his way (וַיֵּלֶךְ יִרְמְיָהוּ הַנָּבִיא לְדַרְכּוֹ, vayyelekh yirm'yahu hannavi l'darko)—Jeremiah departs without immediate response.
Jeremiah's departure shows wisdom: not every false claim requires instant rebuttal. Sometimes truth needs time to formulate proper response. Jeremiah waits for divine instruction rather than reacting emotionally. Hananiah's specific timeline would eventually expose him—either events vindicate him (they won't) or time proves him false. Faithful ministry sometimes requires patience, letting lies hang themselves with their own specifics.