Ezra 5:10

Authorized King James Version

PDF

We asked their names also, to certify thee, that we might write the names of the men that were the chief of them.

Original Language Analysis

וְאַ֧ף also H638
וְאַ֧ף also
Strong's: H638
Word #: 1 of 11
meaning accession (used as an adverb or conjunction); also or yea; adversatively though
שֻׁם the names H8036
שֻׁם the names
Strong's: H8036
Word #: 2 of 11
an appellation, as a mark or memorial of individuality; by implication honor, authority, character
שְׁאֵ֥לְנָא We asked H7593
שְׁאֵ֥לְנָא We asked
Strong's: H7593
Word #: 3 of 11
to ask
לְּהֹ֖ם H0
לְּהֹ֖ם
Strong's: H0
Word #: 4 of 11
לְהוֹדָֽעוּתָ֑ךְ to certify H3046
לְהוֹדָֽעוּתָ֑ךְ to certify
Strong's: H3046
Word #: 5 of 11
to inform
דִּ֛י H1768
דִּ֛י
Strong's: H1768
Word #: 6 of 11
that, used as relative conjunction, and especially (with a preposition) in adverbial phrases; also as preposition of
נִכְתֻּ֥ב thee that we might write H3790
נִכְתֻּ֥ב thee that we might write
Strong's: H3790
Word #: 7 of 11
to grave, by implication, to write (describe, inscribe, prescribe, subscribe)
שֻׁם the names H8036
שֻׁם the names
Strong's: H8036
Word #: 8 of 11
an appellation, as a mark or memorial of individuality; by implication honor, authority, character
גֻּבְרַיָּ֖א of the men H1400
גֻּבְרַיָּ֖א of the men
Strong's: H1400
Word #: 9 of 11
a person
דִּ֥י H1768
דִּ֥י
Strong's: H1768
Word #: 10 of 11
that, used as relative conjunction, and especially (with a preposition) in adverbial phrases; also as preposition of
בְרָֽאשֵׁיהֹֽם׃ that were the chief H7217
בְרָֽאשֵׁיהֹֽם׃ that were the chief
Strong's: H7217
Word #: 11 of 11
the head; figuratively, the sum

Analysis & Commentary

The officials requested names "to certify thee"—that is, to provide the king with documented accountability. The Aramaic lehodautakh (to inform you) indicates the letter's purpose was providing complete information for royal evaluation. Recording "the names of the men that were the chief of them" would enable the king to investigate the leaders' backgrounds and legitimacy.

This bureaucratic meticulousness, though threatening to the Jews, demonstrated Persian administrative thoroughness. Every significant project required identifiable leadership accountable to imperial authority. Yet God used this documentation requirement to establish the legitimacy of Zerubbabel, Jeshua, and other leaders—their names would be permanently recorded in both Persian archives and Scripture.

Historical Context

Persian administrative documents consistently recorded the names of responsible officials and project supervisors. The satrapies maintained extensive archives of correspondence, authorizations, and personnel records. This documentation served both administrative efficiency and imperial control, enabling the central government to track activities throughout the vast empire stretching from India to Egypt.

Questions for Reflection