Ezra 10:28

Authorized King James Version

PDF

Of the sons also of Bebai; Jehohanan, Hananiah, Zabbai, and Athlai.

Original Language Analysis

וּמִבְּנֵ֖י Of the sons H1121
וּמִבְּנֵ֖י Of the sons
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 1 of 6
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
בֵּבָ֑י also of Bebai H893
בֵּבָ֑י also of Bebai
Strong's: H893
Word #: 2 of 6
bebai, an israelite
יְהֽוֹחָנָ֥ן Jehohanan H3076
יְהֽוֹחָנָ֥ן Jehohanan
Strong's: H3076
Word #: 3 of 6
jehochanan, the name of eight israelites
חֲנַנְיָ֖ה Hananiah H2608
חֲנַנְיָ֖ה Hananiah
Strong's: H2608
Word #: 4 of 6
chananjah, the name of thirteen israelites
זַבַּ֥י H2079
זַבַּ֥י
Strong's: H2079
Word #: 5 of 6
zabbai (or zaccai), an israelite
עַתְלָֽי׃ and Athlai H6270
עַתְלָֽי׃ and Athlai
Strong's: H6270
Word #: 6 of 6
athlai, an israelite

Analysis & Commentary

Of the sons also of Bebai; Jehohanan, Hananiah, Zabbai, and Athlai. The Bebai (בֵּבַי, Bebay, possibly meaning "fatherly" or "paternal") family listed four offenders. Jehohanan (יְהוֹחָנָן, "Yahweh is gracious") heads the list, his name proclaiming divine grace while his actions spurned covenant mercy by marrying outside Israel. The irony cuts deep—experiencing Yahweh's gracious restoration from exile, yet showing no corresponding gratitude through obedience.

Hananiah (חֲנַנְיָה, "Yahweh has been gracious") doubles the grace emphasis, suggesting perhaps these were brothers or close relatives whose names commemorated divine favor during exile or return. Yet grace received without responsive faithfulness produces presumption, not holiness. Zabbai (זַבַּי, "gift" or "endowment") and Athlai (עֲתְלַי, possibly "Yahweh is exalted") complete the roster, each name a testimony to divine blessing now associated with covenant violation. The fourfold list from Bebai creates cumulative weight of evidence against a family that should have modeled covenant loyalty.

Historical Context

Bebai's family counted 623 members who returned from exile (Ezra 2:11). Four violations from this clan, while fewer in absolute numbers than larger families, represented significant portion given their size. The post-exilic community (458 BC) struggled with maintaining boundaries against Ammonite, Moabite, and Canaanite populations. Deuteronomy 7:3-4 and 23:3-6 explicitly prohibited such intermarriages because they inevitably led to idolatry—precisely what threatened the fragile restored community.

Questions for Reflection