But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God—Paul concludes the head-covering section with apostolic authority. Εἰ δέ τις δοκεῖ φιλόνεικος εἶναι (if anyone seems contentious/quarrelsome)—Paul anticipates objections. Philoneikos means love of strife, combative disputation. Some Corinthians were philosophically argumentative, enjoying debate more than obedience.
We have no such custom (ἡμεῖς τοιαύτην συνήθειαν οὐκ ἔχομεν)—what custom? Either
no custom of contentiousness—we don't argue endlessly about apostolic teaching; or
no custom of women praying unveiled—universal church practice supports Paul's instruction.
Context favors interpretation 1: we (apostles) don't tolerate endless quarreling. Neither the churches of God—the catholic (universal) church agrees. This isn't Paul's idiosyncratic opinion but apostolic tradition received by all churches. Appeal to universal practice ends debate—submission to apostolic authority, not individual preference, governs Christian worship.
Historical Context
Corinthian culture prized rhetorical skill, philosophical debate, and sophistic argumentation (1:20, 2:1-5). Corinthian Christians carried this combative intellectualism into the church, quarreling over Paul's teachings rather than submitting to them. Paul's appeal to universal church custom (similar to 4:17, 7:17, 14:33) invokes catholic authority against local innovation. The early church had remarkable unity in worship practices despite geographic and cultural diversity—evidence of apostolic authority and Spirit-led consensus.
Questions for Reflection
How does Paul's appeal to universal church practice challenge modern individualism in worship preferences?
When is theological debate profitable, and when does it become contentious quarreling that dishonors God?
What role should 'the churches of God' (catholic tradition) play in local church decision-making today?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God—Paul concludes the head-covering section with apostolic authority. Εἰ δέ τις δοκεῖ φιλόνεικος εἶναι (if anyone seems contentious/quarrelsome)—Paul anticipates objections. Philoneikos means love of strife, combative disputation. Some Corinthians were philosophically argumentative, enjoying debate more than obedience.
We have no such custom (ἡμεῖς τοιαύτην συνήθειαν οὐκ ἔχομεν)—what custom? Either
Context favors interpretation 1: we (apostles) don't tolerate endless quarreling. Neither the churches of God—the catholic (universal) church agrees. This isn't Paul's idiosyncratic opinion but apostolic tradition received by all churches. Appeal to universal practice ends debate—submission to apostolic authority, not individual preference, governs Christian worship.